Revista Cátedra, 8(1), pp. 134-153, January-June 2025. e-ISSN:2631-2875
https://doi.org/10.29166/catedra.v8i1.4529
firm published a report on the research they conducted in the field of education, specifically
in the countries with the best educational excellence indexes. Subsequently, for the second
report they focused on the analysis of twenty educational systems with the highest scores
in their performance results. It is important to point out that this report presents eight
conclusions, among which the second one stands out, which refers to the fact that
“improving the performance of a system requires optimizing the way in which principals
lead and teachers teach” (Crisol, 2010, p. 178). In addition, the seventh and eighth
conclusions speak of leadership within the educational system, and address them from the
perspective of leadership change; and, of the continuity of leadership as an essential
element for the improvement of educational systems
The State executes the steering role of the national education system through the Ministry
of Education (MINEDUC); an institution through which citizens' rights are protected in
application of the Organic Law of Intercultural Education (LOEI, 2021) regarding the
competencies of the National Education Authority, Art. 22, literal a states that:
define standards and indicators of educational quality that will be used
for evaluations conducted by the National Institute for Educational
Evaluation. The standards will be of at least two types: curricular,
referring to student academic performance and aligned with the
mandatory national curriculum; professional, referring to the
performance of teachers and school management personnel (p. 31).
The General Regulations of the LOEI (R-LOEI, 2023) in Article 13 specifically establishes the
components that will be evaluated by the National Institute of Educational Evaluation
(INEVAL) whose assessment is “focused on the expected achievement descriptors,
measurable objectives and that in the case of the performance of education professionals:
they refer to the descriptions of what a competent educational professional should do” (p.
8) referring to the management of rectors, vice rectors, principals, assistant principals,
inspectors, sub-inspectors and teaching staff.
School leadership has become a priority topic of study and analysis for organizations that
generate educational policy worldwide, an example of which is the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2009, an institution that provides a
documentary contribution of research developed in 22 educational systems whose reports
and case studies serve as support for this academic compilation. The OECD's work
addresses issues such as the concept of school leadership, its political priority in changing
environments and its reality. Autonomy, the distribution of functions, and the development
of skills for effective school leadership are topics that are developed from the perspective
of the education systems investigated (OECD, 2009, pp. 9-13). It concludes by stating that
“a recent body of literature on the effects of leadership provides additional evidence that
school leadership influences student learning” (p. 34).
The Center for the Study of Policies and Practices in Education (CEPPE), an educational
research center in Santiago, Chile, makes a reflection in which it describes school leadership
in the following terms: “The impact of this leadership is such that it has been suggested that
the principal is the second most influential internal school variable in student results, after
the teachers themselves” (CEPPE, 2009, p. 20). From this background it can be concluded
that the ability of management personnel to achieve a quality service is surpassed only by
classroom management, an activity that is closer to the teaching-learning process, and in
this sense, it is of utmost importance to analyze and study the intrinsic elements of the
management activities of educational centers, the application of the educational leadership