DOI: 10.29166/odontologia.vol22.n2.2020-5-32
URL: http://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/2211

revisiÓn bibliogrÁfica

Recomendaciones para prevención y control de infecciones por SARS-CoV-2 en odontología

Recommendations for the prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2 infections in dentistry

Recomendações para a prevenção e controle de infecções por SARS-CoV-2 em odontologia


Sandra Suárez Salgado1, Roberto Campuzano1, Marina Dona Vidale1,
Eduardo Garrido Cisneros2, Thaís Gimenez Miniello3

RECIBIDO: 03/04/2020 ACEPTADO: 05/04/2020 PUBLICADO: 07/04/2020

  1. Especialista en Periodoncia. Profesor de pre grado/posgrado. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad central del Ecuador.
  2. PhD, especialista en Periodoncia y en Implantología. Profesor de pre grado/posgrado. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad central del Ecuador.
  3. Stomatology Department, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

CORRESPONDENCIA

Sandra Suárez Salgado

Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Central del Ecuador. Av. América y Universitaria s/n.

smsuarez@uce.edu.ec

RESUMEN

Según la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), la nueva pandemia de neumonía por coronavirus CO¬VID-19 o SARS-CoV-2, en un corto período de tiempo, se ha extendido a todas las regiones del mundo donde el número de casos confirmados y muertes sigue aumentando. Junto con el coronavirus del Síndrome Res-piratorio Agudo Severo (SARS) y el coronavirus del Síndrome Respiratorio del Medio Oriente (MERS), este es el tercer coronavirus humano altamente patógeno que ha surgido en las últimas dos décadas. Frente a esta emergencia de Salud Pública, se ha intentado controlar la propagación global, sin embargo, en la gran mayo-ría de países se ha visto desbordada la capacidad de sus sistemas de salud. Se ha observado que medidas adecuadas pueden reducir el riesgo de infección y prevenir efectivamente la propagación de la epidemia. En odontología, debido a la naturaleza especial de sus procedimientos, el riesgo de infección cruzada es alto y las medidas estrictas de prevención y control son importantes, particularmente por la posible atención a pa-cientes asintomáticos capaces de transmitir el virus. Ante la urgente necesidad de establecer protocolos de control de infecciones estrictos y efectivos, se realizó una revisión de la evidencia científica para analizar las características epidemiológicas e infecciosas de SARS-CoV-2 y recomendar medidas de prevención y control en relación a los profesionales y estudiantes de la odontología a fin de bloquear las rutas de transmisión de persona a persona en clínicas y hospitales dentales..

Palabras clave: Betacoronavirus, infecciones por coronavirus, prevención primaria, personal de odontología, epidemiología.


ABSTRACT

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the new pandemic of coronavirus pneumonia COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2, in a short period of time, has spread to all regions of the world where the number of confirmed cases and deaths continues to rise. Along with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS) and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS), this is the third highly pathogenic human coronavirus that has emerged in the past two decades. Faced with this Public Health emergency, attempts have been made to control the global spread; however, in the vast majority of countries the capacity of their health systems has been overwhelmed. Appropriate measures have been found to reduce the risk of infection and effectively prevent the spread of the epidemic. In dentistry, due to the special nature of its procedures, the risk of cross infection is high and strict prevention and control measures are important, particularly due to possible care for asymptomatic patients capable of transmitting the virus. Given the urgent need to establish strict and effective infection control protocols, a review of the scientific evidence was carried out to analyze the epidemiological and infectious characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and to recommend prevention and control measures in relation to professionals and students of dentistry to block person-to-person transmission routes in dental clinics and hospitals.

Keywords: Betacoronavirus, coronavirus infections, primary prevention, dental staff, epidemiology.


RESUMO

Segundo a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), a nova pandemia de pneumonia por coronavírus CO¬VID-19 ou SARS-CoV-2, em um curto período de tempo, se espalhou por todas as regiões do mundo onde o número de casos confirmados e as mortes continuam a aumentar. Juntamente com o coronavírus da Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave (SARS) e o coronavírus da Síndrome Respiratória do Oriente Médio (MERS), este é o terceiro coronavírus humano altamente patogênico que surgiu nas últimas duas décadas. Diante dessa emergência de saúde pública, foram feitas tentativas para controlar a disseminação global, no entanto, na grande maioria dos países, a capacidade de seus sistemas de saúde foi sobrecarregada. Foi observado que medidas apropriadas podem reduzir o risco de infecção e impedir efetivamente a propagação da epidemia. Na odontologia, devido à natureza especial de seus procedimentos, o risco de infecção cruzada é alto e me-didas estritas de prevenção e controle são importantes, principalmente devido ao possível atendimento a pa-cientes assintomáticos capazes de transmitir o vírus. Dada a necessidade urgente de estabelecer protocolos rigorosos e eficazes no controle de infecções, foi realizada uma revisão das evidências científicas para anali-sar as características epidemiológicas e infecciosas do SARS-CoV-2 e recomendar medidas de prevenção e controle em relação a profissionais e estudantes da odontologia, tentando bloquear as rotas de transmissão em clínicas dentárias e hospitais.

Palavras-chave: Betacoronavírus, infecções por coronavírus, prevenção primária, equipe odontológica, epidemiologia.


INTRODUCTION

The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus or β-coronavirus (2019-nCoV), started in Wuhan, China and due to rapid expansion has become a major public health problem not only for China but also for others countries of the world1. The etiological agent presents a high transmissibility so that the world assists the isolation of people in their homes before the possibility of contagion. Although there are recent cases of epidemics, the majority originating from Asia2, none have presented the level of contagion of the current infection. The WHO has previously warned that lack of awareness among health workers and the general public, coupled with inadequate prevention and control procedures, can lead to outbreaks based on nosocomial infection3.

It is sad that, despite the existence of previous scientific evidence, we resist learning from previous experiences. Eggers and cols. (2015), highlighted five main factors that contributed to the spread of the MERS-CoV; Today perfectly applicable to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. 1) a lack of awareness among health workers and the general public; 2) measures for the prevention and control of suboptimal infections in hospitals; 3) crowded emergency rooms and multi-bed hospital rooms; 4) patients seeking care in multiple hospitals; 5) multiple visitors housed with infected patients in hospital rooms4.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has unfortunately spread globally resulting in the 2019–2020 pandemic, as declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)5. In Ecuador, the first case was confirmed on February 29, 2020, declaring a national health emergency on the following March 11. At the end of this article, there are more than 3,600 confirmed cases, with more than 180 people dead6. The experience of contagion in other countries, mainly China, Korea, Italy and Spain, shows that there are a considerable number of doctors and health personnel who have been infected and some have tragically died5, for which the entities in charge have issued urgently indications and recommendations for the management of affected patients7.

Participants in dental practice are exposed to an enormous risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. On March 15, 2020, the New York Times published an article where a schematic figure describes that dentists are the workers most exposed to the risk of being affected by SARS-CoV-2, much more than nurses and general practitioners8,5; For this reason, dentists should be aware that the routine form of dental care will be modified forever or at least for a long period of time because there is a risk of contagion, particularly due to possible care for asymptomatic patients capable of transmitting the virus and because the way of working puts us in direct contact with potential transmitters and the ways of transmission of the virus are precisely through saliva, bioaerosols, contact with surfaces and work elements that we use daily in the dental office9.

There is a dilemma regarding dental treatment, mainly due to the risk of treating asymptomatic patients, potential transmitters of the disease. On the one hand, dental procedures increase the risk of cross infection; while, on the other hand, the well-being of patients is compromised if treatment is not administered and this can be considered unethical. Therefore, treatment planning and work practice should be modified to minimize aerosol generation procedures within a prevention and control environment and, according to some authorities, to consider an approach for cohort convalescence cases for up to 3 weeks from the beginning of the disease10.

 

The new coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2)

Viruses need to enter a cell to replicate, and there must be an affinity between the target cell and the virus, so they are tissue-specific and even species-specific, which would not allow contagion between different species11; however, there may be mutations that allow the jump from an animal to a human; In the case of SARS-CoV-2, the natural host may be the bat Rhinolophus affinis, since it showed 96.2% of the complete genome identity to BatCoV RaTG1312; but, the differences may also suggest that there are one or more intermediate hosts between the bat and the human. A coronavirus isolated from the pangolin bat comprised 99% genome sequence similarity, indicating that the pangolin may be the intermediate host for SARS-CoV-213.

Coronaviruses belong to the family of Coronaviridae, order of Nidovirals, which have the largest RNA genomes14. There are 4 Coronavirus subgroups (α, β, γ, δ), with SARS-CoV-2 belonging to the β-CoV subtype. Most of the coronavirus can cause infectious diseases in mammals and birds. Α-CoV and β-CoV mainly infect the respiratory, gastrointestinal and central nervous systems of humans and mammals, while γ-CoV and δ-CoV mainly infect birds15. SARS-CoV-2 has the typical protein spike structure of all coronaviruses and binds to target cell receptors via an S protein, facilitating entry into them. Two SARS-CoV-2 strains have been identified in recent weeks: the most aggressive L (70% of cases in China) and the S (least aggressive and 30% of cases)12.

Figure 1: Electron micrograph and schematic representation. N, nucleocapsid protein; S, spike protein; M, membrane protein; E, envelope protein. The coronavirus M protein interacts with protein N

Fuente: Gorbalenya AE, 200614


Although coronavirus infections normally give mild symptoms, some strains have produced severe damage accompanied by death in many patients, such as the case of Acute Severe Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2002 and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS ) in 201216. The new coronavirus affects the airways and can cause anything from a mild condition, with a dry cough and fever, to much more severe symptoms, such as acute respiratory failure and death-causing pneumonia17.

The incubation period for SARS-CoV-2 is in a range of 5 or 6 days, but it has been evident that it can be up to 14 days during which many patients remain asymptomatic or with mild symptoms9. This period depends on the age of the patient and the state of his immune system. For example, it is shorter in patients older than 70 years. The most common symptoms are general malaise, fever, cough, and fatigue, while other symptoms include sputum production, headache, hemoptysis, diarrhea, dyspnea, and lymphopenia18.

 

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Being a new virus, various aspects of SARS-CoV-2 and its propagation mechanism are unknown; there was a suspicion of a zoonotic infection, but evidence has shown that mainly person-to-person transmission exists, as has occurred between close contacts since mid-December 201919. Current knowledge is largely derived from similar coronaviruses that are transmitted from person to person through respiratory fomites, but evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is more infectious than SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV12. Respiratory viruses are typically most contagious when a patient is symptomatic. However, there is evidence to suggest that transmission occurs during the asymptomatic incubation period20,21.

Common routes of transmission of the new coronavirus include direct transmission (cough, sneeze, and inhalation of droplets) and contact transmission (with the oral, nasal, and ocular mucous membranes)12. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, emphasis has been placed on the possibility of autoinoculation; the hands are considered as a vector and are involved in the transmission of respiratory infections. Touching the face with the hands is very frequent; therefore, the risk of autoinoculation must be taken seriously22.

It has been suggested that aerosols can transmit the virus. The saliva droplets discharged by people who sneeze or cough, have a particle size is generally 1 to 5 mm and spread in a space of approximately 1 to 2 m from the source of infection; however, the aerosol can travel tens of meters or more10. Other research has already shown that aerosols are involved in the spread of SARS, MERS, H1N1, and some other diseases2,17. If aerosols can spread SARS-CoV-2, prevention and control will be much more difficult23.

Furthermore, it has been confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 enters the cell in the same route as the SARS-CoV coronavirus, that is, through the ACE2 cell receptor (angiotensin II converting enzyme). SARS-CoV-2 can effectively use ACE2 as a receptor to invade cells, allowing human-to-human transmission24. Cells containing ACE2 receptor were found to be abundantly present throughout the respiratory tract, as well as cells morphologically compatible with the salivary gland duct and epithelium in the human mouth12.

 

Risk of infection in dental environments

Dental patients and professionals may be exposed to pathogenic microorganisms, including viruses and bacteria that infect the oral cavity and respiratory tract. In the past decade, it has been established that, although it is evident that symptomatic patients do not seek dental care due to the characteristics of the infection, the probability of care for asymptomatic carriers who may have contracted the infection must be taken into account, which leads to a subclinical infection10. Additionally, and due to the expansion of SARS-CoV-2, we face a constant risk that an early-infected healthcare worker may bring the virus to our facilities and pass it on to others. Transmission of people with asymptomatic infection has been well documented, although it is unclear to what extent such transmission contributes to the overall spread of infection25.

The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection invariably occurs in dental care settings due to the specificity of its procedures such as face-to-face communication, exposure to saliva, blood or other fluids, and the handling of sharp or sharps instruments12; they can be transmitted through the inhalation of microorganisms suspended in the air for long periods; additionally, human coronaviruses can remain on inanimate surfaces at room temperature for up to 9 days. At a temperature of 30°C or more, the duration of persistence is shorter; therefore, surface contamination in healthcare settings is a potential source of viral transmission26.

The asymptomatic incubation period for people infected with SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to be 1 to 14 days, and it was confirmed that people without symptoms can transmit the virus12. Likewise, it is unknown if people who have recovered from SARS can carry the virus beyond the isolation period, and the infectivity of these patients is also unknown10. Since SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted directly from one person to another by respiratory droplets, emerging evidence suggests that it can also be transmitted through contact and fomites12. In addition, it has been shown that the viruses were present in the saliva of infected individuals, however, it should be noted that the saliva samples also contain secretions that come down from the nasopharynx or leave the lung through the action of cilia that they line the airways27.

Evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted through droplets, close contact, and fomites. Particles or droplets greater than 100 µm in diameter, such as so-called splashes, are propelled through the air for short distances, generally 3 feet or less, and are quickly deposited on animate or inanimate surfaces. On the other hand, smaller droplets (or aerosols, usually less than 10 µm in size) or small particle debris from evaporated droplets are generally airborne and dragged through the air for an extended period and may settle in the surrounding areas in the clinic10.

Figura 2: Different transmission routes in the dental environment: aerosol, drops and fomites

Fuente: Ziyu GE, 202028


Aerosols have been defined as particles that can remain in the air for hours or days and can produce direct effects (they are inhaled, deposited or enter the body) or indirect effects (when the contaminated particles remain on the surfaces)29. Kutter et al. (2018), showed that aerosols from highly virulent pathogens like severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) can travel more than 1.8 meters and are able to stay on different surfaces, air samples and surface swabs frequently touched in a room occupied by a SARS patient tested positive for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), even though viruses could not be cultured from these samples29.


Prevention and control

The outbreak of COVID-19 has clearly put oral health professionals at risk of infection, it is of great importance that they are familiar with the identification of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and what are the protective measures that should be used for the dental care of these patients and thus avoid their transmission, taking into account that aerosol drops produced during dental practice are the main routes for the transmission and spread of this pathology30,12. There is no consensus on the provision of dental services during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, the proposed measures are based on relevant experience, guidelines and research, and emergency management guidelines for the prevention and control of infections in the face of outbreak of new coronavirus pneumonia31,12,9,30,32.


1. Patient evaluation or previous inspection (triage)

It is extremely important to identify possible suspicious cases that arise in the dental office. With the evidence given that the incubation period lasts up to 14 days, it is not always possible to identify asymptotic carriers early or without tests taking into account that SARS-CoV-2 is contagious during the incubation period12,30. Before entering the patient's dental chair, the temperature should be controlled with a digital forehead thermometer. In addition, a questionnaire must be completed that includes the following questions to know the personal history, travel history and epidemiological history:

 

For suspected / confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases requiring urgent dental treatment, the highest level of personal protection should be implemented. If a patient answers "YES" to any of the screening questions, and their body temperature is below 37.3° C, the dentist may defer treatment up to 14 days later and suggest that the patient be quarantined at home. If the answer is "YES" to any of the questions and the temperature is above 37.3°C, the patient requires immediate quarantine and the corresponding health authorities should be notified. If the patient answers "NO" to the questions and his temperature is below 37.3°C, dental care is possible with additional protective measures and avoiding the production of aerosols as much as possible. If the patient answers "NO" to the questions and his temperature is above 37.3° C, he requires additional medical attention and no treatment is suggested30,12,9,33,34.


2. Mouthwash before dental procedures

Gargling represents an effective personal hygiene measure against air / droplet transmission as it can reduce the microbe count in the pharynx. Along with hand washing and wearing masks, gargling has been proposed as one of the top three measures of personal hygiene protection against common airborne and droplet infections4.

The use of mouth rinses before dental care is one of the most effective methods to reduce the burden of microorganisms in oral sprays. The guide for the diagnosis and treatment of Coronavirus pneumonia, developed by the Chinese Government's National Health Commission, indicated that 0.12% chlorhexidine, which is commonly used as a mouthwash in practice, is not effective for SARS- CoV-2; This virus is susceptible to oxidation, so the suggested mouthwashes are 1% hydrogen peroxide or 2% iodopovidone30,33.

The oxidative potency of povidone-iodine PVP-I enables the released iodine to react rapidly with functional groups of amino acids and nucleotides, as well as with fatty acid double bonds, resulting in multiple destruction of various structures and enzymes of microbes and viruses. The development of resistance mechanisms against very broad oxidative attack seems almost impossible35.

 

3. Personal protection measures for dental professionals.

Hand hygiene:

Handwashing is always essential in dental practice, but its proper compliance is of utmost importance to avoid the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. A hand hygiene guideline is proposed (2 before 3 after) which are those suggested by the WHO (2009), oral professionals should wash their hands before examining the patient, before dental procedures, after touching the patient, after touching the environment or equipment without disinfection, and after exposure to body fluids. More caution should be exercised in avoiding touching your own eyes, mouth and nose36,30.

The WHO (2020), stated that hand hygiene includes cleaning hands with an alcohol-based disinfectant or with soap and water; both equally effective. Handwashing must use an appropriate technique to achieve the objective: wet your hands and apply the necessary amount of liquid soap, rub your hands together for a minimum of 15 seconds so that the solution comes in contact with all the surfaces of the hand , paying special attention to the tips and folds of the fingers and thumb, rinse your hands well under running water, then dry them with disposable towels. Washing should take between 20 to 30 seconds. All accessories such as rings, bracelets, cords, earrings and watches should be removed prior to washing12,36,10.

The technique of using alcohol-based disinfectants is to rub your hands so that the solution comes in contact with all the surfaces of the hand, paying special attention to the fingertips, thumbs and areas between the fingers continue rubbing until the solution has evaporated and hands are dry, approximately takes 20 seconds. The range of antimicrobial activity in alcohol-based hand sanitizers varies with the alcohol compound (ethanol, isopropanol, or n-propanol) used, 60% volumes of n-propanol is approximately equivalent to 70% volumes of isopropanol and 80% volumes of ethanol36.

 

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Since the transmission of infection by airborne droplets is considered the main route of spread, particularly in dental practice, the use of a suitable PPE is recommended, which includes protective glasses, masks, gloves, caps, face shields and protective clothing for all dental care during the epidemic period. It should be noted that protective equipment will only reduce the risk of transmission and cannot provide a failsafe barrier12.

According to the possibility of spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection, according to Peng et al.12, three-level protection measures of dental professionals are recommended for specific situations:

1) Primary protection (standard protection for personnel in clinical settings). Wear disposable work cap, disposable surgical mask and work clothes (white coat), wear goggles or face shield, and disposable latex gloves or nitrile gloves if necessary.

2) Secondary protection (advanced protection for dental professionals). Wear disposable medical cap, disposable surgical mask, goggles, face shield, and disposable isolation work clothes or surgical clothing outside and disposable latex gloves.

3) Tertiary protection (reinforced protection when the patient is contacted with an infection suspected or confirmed by SARS-CoV-2). Although a patient with 2019-nCoV infection is not expected to be treated in the dental clinic, in the unlikely event that this occurs, and the dental professional cannot avoid close contact, special protective clothing is required. If no protective clothing is available, work clothing (white coat) should be worn with additional disposable protective clothing on the outside. In addition, disposable medical hat, goggles, face shield, disposable surgical mask, disposable latex gloves, and waterproof shoe cover should be worn12.

 

Face masks

A mask is a core component of PPE that physicians need when caring for symptomatic patients with viral respiratory infections, along with a gown, gloves, and eye protection. But, in caring for a patient with unrecognized SARS-CoV-2, a mask alone in this setting will reduce the risk just a little, as it does not provide protection against drops that can get into the eyes or from patient fomites or in the environment that providers can pick up and carry to their mucosa (particularly given the concern that mask wearers may have a greater tendency to touch their faces). Additionally, a mask can reduce the likelihood of transmission of asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic healthcare workers with COVID-19 to other providers and patients25.

Masks must meet certain conditions: marginal fit to the face and filtering capacity37. A mask is effective when the diameter of the pores of your filter is up to 22 microns38. The effectiveness of the masks has been compared, and it was determined that, when using aerosol powder with particles from 1 to 300 microns in diameter, they achieved 85 to 92% protection for surgical masks and 94 to 96% for masks with respirator39.

Surgical masks commonly used in dentistry should be used if working at a distance of at least 1 m from the patient. When performing aerosol-generating procedures (using a high-speed handpiece, air-water syringe, or ultrasonic scalex), an N95 FFP2 respirator mask should be used when the risk is low or moderate. For emergency care of patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, the use of FFP3 masks is suggested, which is the highest level of protection. Particulate respirator masks with a filtration efficiency of 95% of particles up to 0.3 μ are of the type N95, N99, N100, PFF2 or PFF310,30.

Additionally, consideration should be given to wearing face masks that should be changed when soiled or wet, should never be put back on after they have been removed, should not be left hanging around the neck, and should not touch the front of the head mask while wearing it36.

 

Protective glasses

It is clinically evident that SARS-CoV-2 can also be transmitted through contact with the mucous membranes of the eyes, since infectious droplets could easily contaminate the human conjunctival epithelium. To protect the eyes from aerosols during dental procedures, safety glasses with side shields should be worn throughout the treatment and disinfected between patients30,36.

The Brazilian Federal Council of Dentistry has recommended the use of face masks or "Face Shield". The eye or facial protection must cover the front and sides of the face, and must be used exclusively by each professional responsible for care. After use, it should be cleaned and disinfected with 70% alcohol or another disinfectant standardized by the health service for this purpose32.

 

Waterproof coats

The type of gown required depends on the degree of risk, including the anticipated degree of contact with infectious material, the possibility of blood and bodily substances entering through clothing or skin. Generally, when the procedure to be performed does not require total asepsis, the use of non-sterile waterproof gowns is indicated to protect the skin and avoid contamination of clothing that may be generated by splashes or sprays of blood or saliva. The gowns must be changed between patients, and they must also be long-sleeved and disposable36. Surgical gowns with tight cuffs should be worn to protect both the physician and the patient from the transmission of microorganisms on the skin40.

Uniforms are not considered personal protective equipment as they are made of absorbent materials and provide little protection against pathogens. Single-use plastic aprons should be worn to protect against splashes and should be changed between patients40.

 

Use of gloves

Gloves avoid direct contact with blood or body substances, mucous membranes, lacerated skin and other potentially infectious materials and potentially contaminated material surfaces. Gloves must be disposable, they can be made of latex or nitrile, nitrile gloves being the most recommended because they have greater resistance to the entry of microorganisms33.

 

Safe work with sharp objects

Injuries from "sharps" are among the most common types of injuries in dental practice, with an estimated half of these being preventable. These skin lesions are the main route of virus transmission by blood. Therefore, it is essential that appropriate risk assessments, accident reporting procedures and, most importantly, safe work practices are applied. Many sharps injuries occur outside the patient's mouth during rewinding, dismantling, or removal of needles, or during cleaning of sharp instruments such as drills, scanners, and probe tips. Used sharps must be placed in a container in accordance with sanitary regulations40.

 

Four-hand operation:

Within dental practice it is important to avoid the generation of aerosols during dental procedures. The use of high-speed suctions, in addition to allowing a dry operating field for dental work, also helps to reduce the contamination of the environment generated by aerosols produced during dental practice by 93%, making it of great importance to implement the work with four hands12. It is important to note that four-hand work, when applied correctly, prevents the professional who is contaminated with saliva and patient fluids from becoming a vector and spreading the infection in the dental environment.

 

Insulation with rubber dam

Isolation with rubber dams can significantly minimize the production of aerosols contaminated with saliva and blood, particularly in cases where high-speed hand pieces and ultrasound devices are used since many of the dental procedures include the production of aerosols such as : coronary and cavity preparations, removal of restorations, endodontic therapy, removal of orthodontic appliances, polishing restorations, among others. It is reported that the use of rubber dams could significantly reduce airborne particles by 70% combined with high speed suction28.

According to Ge and cols.30, a disadvantage of using the rubber dam is that it is not feasible in procedures that require sub gingival instrumentation, for which some alternatives are proposed:

 


Anti-reflux hand piece

The anti-reflux high-speed dental hand piece can prevent cross-contamination, significantly reducing the return flow of bacteria and oral viruses in the tubes of the hand piece and dental unit compared to the hand piece without anti-reflux function. Therefore, the use of dental hand pieces without anti-reflux function should be prohibited during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic period. Although it is already part of the biosecurity measures, the need to autoclave the hand pieces after daily care is reinforced here10.

 

Infection control to the dental laboratory

Dental impressions, bite records, trial prostheses, plaster models, can lead to transmit diseases, since they were in contact with body fluids. To reduce the possibility of cross infection among patients, dentists, assistants, and laboratory technicians, it is essential that all impressions and any prosthodontics work that came in contact with the patient's mouth be disinfected41.

The American Dental Academy (ADA) and the International Dental Federation (IDF) insist on disinfecting all impressions taken from patients before sending them to laboratories. Gupta et al.41, carried out a comparative study between various methods of disinfection of impressions and concluded that washing the impression with water does not reduce the microbial load of the impression, the most effective and accurate disinfection method is pre-procedure mouthwash, which also did not cause distortion in the print. Together they established the following recommendations:

 

Radiographic examinations

Intraoral X-ray examination is the most common radiographic technique in dentistry; however, it can stimulate saliva secretion and cough, therefore extraoral dental radiographs, such as panoramic radiography and tomography, are appropriate alternatives during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak9. Digital Rx equipment sensors must be protected by disposable material and must be changed after each procedure.

 

4. Prevention and control of the diagnostic and treatment environment

Diagnosis and treatment of the environment disinfection method

Medical institutions, such as the dental office, must take effective and strict disinfection measures both in the clinical setting and in the public area30.

It is recommended to mop the floor with water twice a day with 500 mg / L of disinfectant that contains chlorine; In case of suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases, apply 1000 mg / L of disinfectant containing chlorine to disinfect the surface and floor of objects. Cleaning items such as rags and mops to disinfect the floor and surface of objects should be clearly marked and disinfected after use42.

Kariwa et al. (2006), evaluated the efficacy of a series of chemical agents and various physical conditions to determine their ability to inactivate the coronavirus of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV). Treatment with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) products for 2 minutes reduced virus infectivity to 1.17 X 106 TCID50/ml below the detectable level. The efficiency of 70% ethanol was equivalent to that of PVP-I products. Fixation of SARS CoV infected Vero E6 cells with a fixative including formalin, glutaraldehyde, methanol, and acetone for 5 minutes or more removed all infectivity. Heating the virus to 56°C for 60 minutes or more reduced the virus infectivity from 2.6 x 107 to undetectable levels. Irradiation with ultraviolet light at 134 µW/cm2 for 15 minutes reduced infectivity from 3.8 x 107 to 180 TCID50/ ml; however, prolonged irradiation (60 min) failed to eliminate the remaining virus, leaving 18.8 TCID50/ml43.

Li et al.10, suggest several complementary measures to cleaning. Ultraviolet radiation can be used in the consulting room twice a day for 30 minutes each time. Good ventilation should be maintained 2-3 times a day for at least 30 minutes each time. The diagnosis and treatment area should increase the physical interval of the patients. Non-independent dental chair clinics can organize a dental chair to schedule a visit. Place as few items as possible on the counter in the consultation area and do not place personal household items42.

According to Ge et al.30, in the waiting room, magazines should be removed to avoid cross-contamination, in addition, instruction signs should be placed on how to cough or sneeze, and suitable trash cans should be placed for disposable handkerchiefs. Cleaning and disinfection in public areas should include door handles, chairs, desks, elevators30.

Human coronaviruses, like SARS and MERS, can persist on inanimate surfaces for up to 9 days. This can be minimized by disinfecting for one minute with disinfectants containing 62% -71% ethanol, 0.5% hydrogen peroxide or 0.1% (1 g / L) sodium hypochlorite, depending on the surface to be disinfected10,30.

 

Device management and medical items

Instruments and reusable items should be pretreated (enzymatic detergents), washed, sterilized and stored properly12. Indicators such as autoclave tape, sterilization packaging, or bags containing an indicator are useful for identifying items that have been sterilized, but cannot be used to validate the autoclave cycle. However, single-use devices provide a simple alternative to sterilizing sensitive equipment 40.

Disinfection processes aim to reduce the microbial load to levels that are considered acceptable. Cleaning and disinfection can be done manually or, preferably, using automated systems. Ultrasonic baths provide excellent cleaning for intricate, jointed, or serrated stainless steel instruments prior to sterilization40.

 

Medical waste management

Medical waste should be transported to the temporary storage area of the clinic or hospital. Medical waste (including disposable protective equipment after use) and household waste generated by the treatment of patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection are considered infectious medical waste, must be transported with all protections to the area of Temporary storage, using double yellow and ligature bags for closure, must be appropriately marked. These wastes must be transported by the appropriate companies for final disposal12.

 

Professional vaccination:

Health professionals, being more exposed, have a high risk of contracting infectious diseases, so they must be immunized. The Brazilian Ministry of Health decided to anticipate the National Influenza Vaccination Campaign as a strategy to decrease the number of people with influenza this winter, this may well be applied by the dental professional since they appear stationary in our setting. The vaccine is not effective against COVID-19, but it is a way to help health professionals rule out influenza in detection and accelerate the diagnosis of COVID-1932.


Conclusions

Faced with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and due to the unique nature of dentistry, most dental procedures create or present potential risks of infection transmission. Understanding the importance of transmission and its implications in dentistry can facilitate the identification and correction of negligence in daily dental practice. In addition to standard precautions, this review has raised some special precautions that should be implemented during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. All staff should be aware of the importance of cross infection control and the underlying principles for maintaining a safe work environment. Understanding the modes of transmission of infectious agents is important in establishing appropriate barriers against transmission. Procedures need to be constantly updated to ensure that systems are operating correctly and that they comply with the latest international and local guidelines. In this process, dental students' awareness of their behavior must also be formed and their understanding improved to optimize compliance with prevention and control protocols.




Bibliografía

  1. Phelan AL, Katz R, Gostin LO. The Novel Coronavirus Originating in Wuhan, China Challenges for Global Health Governance. JAMA. 2020 Jan; 323(8): p. 709-710. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.1097. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2760500
  2. Yu ITS, Li, Wong TW, Tam W, Chan AT, Lee J, et al. Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus. N Engl J Med. 2004 April 22; 350(1): p. 1731-1739. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15102999
  3. WHO. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) Summary of Current Situation, Literature Update and Risk Assessment. Ginebra, Suiza: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/179184
  4. Eggers M, Eickmann M, Zorn. Rapid and Effective Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine Products Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA). Infect Dis Ther. 2015 Dec; 4(4): p. 491–501. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-015-0091-9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416214
  5. Spagnuolo, De Vito, Rengo S, Tatullo M. COVID-19 Outbreak: An Overview on Dentistry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020 Mar; 17(6): p. 1-3. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062094. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235685
  6. MSP. Situación Nacional por COVID-19: Actualización de casos. Informe No. 022. Quito: Ministerio de Salud Pública, COE Nacional; 2020 Marzo 28. Available from: https://www.gestionderiesgos.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Informe-de-Situaci%C3%B3n-No022-Casos-Coronavirus-Ecuador-28032020.pdf
  7. WHO. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when COVID-19 is suspected. Ginebra, Suiza; 2020a. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/clinical-management-of-severe-acute-respiratory-infection-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected
  8. Gamio L. The Workers Who Face the Greatest Coronavirus Risk. The New York Times. 2020 Marzo 15. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/15/business/economy/coronavirus-worker-risk.html
  9. Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicines. Journal of dental Research. 2020; p. 1-7. DOI: 10.1177/0022034520914246. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0022034520914246
  10. Li RWK, Leung KWC, Sun FCS, Samaranayake LP. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and the GDP. Part II: Implications for GDPs. British Dental Journal. 2004 Aug; 197(3): p. 130–134. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811522. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091810/
  11. Sapp P, Eversole L, Wysocki G. Patología Oral y maxilofacial contemporanea. 2nd ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2005. Available from: https://inspectioncopy.elsevier.com/6/es/book/details/9788481747898
  12. Peng, Xu, Li, Cheng, Zhou, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. International Journal of Oral Science. 2020 Feb; 12(9). DOI: 10.1038/S41368-020-0075-9. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41368-020-0075-9
  13. Wahba L, Jain N, Fire AZ, Shoura MJ, Artiles KL, McCoy MJ, et al. Identification of a pangolin niche for a 2019-nCoV-like Coronavirus via an Extensive Meta-metagenomic Searc. BioRxiv. 2020 Feb. DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.08.939660. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.08.939660v2
  14. Gorbalenya AE, Enjuanes, Ziebuhr, Snijder EJ. Nidovirales: Evolving the largest RNA virus genome. Virus Research. 2006 Feb; 117(1): p. 17–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.017. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16503362
  15. Fehr AR, Perlman S. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Springer; 2015. p. 1-23. Available from: https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007%2F978-1-4939-2438-7_1
  16. Rodríguez-Morales AJ, MacGregor K, Kanagarajah S, Patel D, Schlagenhauf P. Going global – Travel and the 2019 novel coronavirus. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2020 Feb; 33(101578): p. 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101578. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32044389
  17. Sabino Silva R, Gomez A, Siqueira W. Coronavirus COVID-19 impacts to dentistry and potential. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2020 Feb; p. 1619-1621. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03248-x. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00784-020-03248-x
  18. Rothan H, Byrareddy S. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Journal of Autoimmunity. 2020 Feb; p. 1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113704
  19. Li Q, Cols. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar; 382(1): p. 1199-207. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
  20. Lai CC, Cols.. Asymptomatic carrier state, acute respiratory disease, and pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Facts and myths. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2020 Mar; p. 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.02.012. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32173241
  21. CDC. How COVID-19 Spreads. Atlanta, Georgia, Estados Unidos: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html
  22. Kwok JLA, Gralt J, McLaws ML. Face touching: A frequent habit that has implications for hand hygiene. American Journal of Infection Control. 2015 Feb; 43(2): p. 112-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.015. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25637115
  23. Wang J, Du. COVID-19 may transmit through aerosol. Irish Journal of Medical Science. 2020 March; 1971. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02218-2. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11845-020-02218-2
  24. Zhou P, Yang X, Wang X, Cols. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020 Feb; 579: p. 270–273. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7
  25. Klompas, Morris CA, Sinclair , Pearson , Shenoy ES. Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2006372. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32237672
  26. Kampf G, Todt, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2020 Feb; 104: p. 246-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022. Available from: https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701(20)30046-3/fulltext
  27. To KKW, Cols.. Consistent Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Saliva. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020 Feb; p. 1-3. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa149. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047895
  28. Ge Zy, Yang Lm, Xia Jj, Fu Xh, Zhang Yz. Possible aerosol transmission of COVID-19 and special precautions in dentistry. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology). 2020 Mar; p. 1-8. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2010010. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089481/
  29. Day CJ, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ. Aerosols and Splatter in Dentistry – A Neglected Menace? Dental Update. 2006; 33(10): p. 601-606. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17209534
  30. Kutter JS, Spronken M, Fraaij P, Fouchier R, Herfst S. Transmission routes of respiratory viruses amonghumans. Current Opinion in Virology. 2018; 28: p. 142–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.01.001. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29452994
  31. Heshu, Zhiqing Y, Wenmei. Emergency management of prevention and control of oral specialist infections during the outbreak of new coronavirus pneumonia. Chinese Journal of Stomatology. 2020; 55. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200205-00037. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080994
  32. Associação de Medicina Intensiva – AMIB & Conselho Federal de Odontologia – CFO. Recomendações AMIB/CFO para atendimento odontológico COVID- 19. Comitê de Odontologia AMIB/CFO de enfrentamento ao COVID-19. Available from: http://website.cfo.org.br/com-apoio-do-cfo-amib-apresenta-recomendacoes-para-enfrentamento-da-covid-19-na-odontologia/
  33. Tuñas ITC, da Silva ET, Santiago SBS, Maia KD, Silva-Júnior GO. Doença pelo Coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19): Uma abordagem preventiva para Odontologia. Brazilian Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 77: p. e1766. DOI: 10.18363/rbo.v77.2020.e1776. Available from: http://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/1776
  34. Wax RS, Christian MD. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2020 Feb. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01591-x. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052373
  35. Eggers, Cols.. Povidone-iodine hand wash and hand rub products demonstrated excellent in vitro virucidal efficacy against Ebola virus and modified vaccinia virus Ankara, the new European test virus for enveloped viruses. BMC Infectious
  36. Diseases. 2015; 15. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1111-9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26381737
    Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care. Australian Gudekines fir the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare. NHMRC (2010). 2010.
  37. Barratt R, Shaban RZ, Gilbert GL. Clinician perceptions of respiratory infection risk; a rationale for research into mask use in routine practice. Infection, Disease & Health. 2019; 24: p. 169 - 176.
  38. Pippin DJ, R.A. V, Weber KK. Efficacy of Face Masks in Preventing lnhala tion of Airborne Contaminants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987; 45: p. 319-323.
  39. Checchi L, Montevecchi M, Moreschi A, Graziosi F, Taddei P, Saveiro Violante F. Efficacy of three face masks in preventing inhalation of airborne contaminants in dental practice. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2005 July; 136(7): p. 877-882.
  40. Jakubovics, Greenwood M, Meech JG. General medicine and surgery for dental practitioners: part 4. Infections and infection control. Br Dent J. 2014 Jul; 217(2): p. 73-77. DOI: 10.18320/JIMD/201603.03151. Available from: DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.593. Available from: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=1810772
  41. Gupta, Aggarwal, Tiwari, Bharat. Comparison of various methods of disinfecting irreversible hydrocolloid impressions using chlorhexidine gluconate: Assessment of antimicrobial efficacy & dimensional changes. Journal of International Medicine and Dentistry. 2016; 3(3): p. 151-160. DOI: 10.18320/JIMD/201603.03151. Available from: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=1810772
  42. Zhiyong L, Liuyan. Prevention and control of new coronavirus infection in oral diagnosis and treatment. Chinese Journal of Stomatology. 2020; 55:e: p. Pre-published on line. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2020.0001. Available from: http://rs.yiigle.com/yufabiao/1181133.htm
  43. Kariwa H, Fujii, Takashima I. Inactivation of SARS Coronavirus by Means of Povidone-Iodine, Physical Conditions and Chemical Reagents. Dermatology. 2006; 212((suppl 1)): p. 119-123. DOI: 10.1159/000089211. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/89211
Suárez-Salgado S; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7958-6918
Campuzano R; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8586-7575
Dona-Vidale M; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-4712
Garrido-Cisneros E; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7899-4576
Gimenez-Miniello T; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-4610

Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual
CC BY-NC-SA
Esta licencia permite a otros entremezclar, ajustar y construir a partir de su obra con fines no comerciales, siempre y cuando le reconozcan la autorÍa y sus nuevas creaciones estÉn bajo una licencia con los mismos tÉrminos.