Individuación y cohesión social: Entre la lógica económica y la racionalidad moral
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the contemporary debate about the nature of the distributional, the choice between ‘economic growth’ and ‘social protection’ is fundamental. Although the most influential modern theories debate this dilemma as part of the bipoliarity ‘freedom-justice’, its implications become crucial in the most recent theoretical deliberation, especially after the bursting of the housing bubble. Not only the characteristic uproots to the markets are updated, but in the midst of the crisis they eclipse both their omnicomprehensive competences and their elective logics of a closed nature that characterize them. This paper aims to detect the underlying distibutional implications in a more open elective context.
Downloads
Article Details
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and assign to the Economics Magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0, which enables third parties to redistribute, commercial or non-commercial, of what has been published as long as the article circulates completely and without changes.
- Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the distribution of the article published in this journal (for example, add it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as they clearly and clearly specify that the article was published for the first time. once in Revista Economía. In case of reproduction, a note similar to the one presented below must be included: This text was originally published in the Revista Economía No.…, volume…, number of pages, year of publication.
- Authors are suggested to publish their work on the internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) of the final version published by Revista Economía since this can lead to greater and faster dissemination of the published article.
References
Akerlof, G. y Shiller, R. (2009). Animal spirits. Barcelona, España: Gestión 2000.
Bauman Z. (2007). Vida de consumo. México df, México: fce.
Bernstein, R. (1994). Habermas y la modernidad. Madrid, España: Ediciones Cátedra.
Dubet, F. (2015). ¿Para qué sirve realmente un sociólogo? Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo xxi.
Castellet, J. M. (1971). Lectura de Marcuse. Barcelona, España: Editorial Seix Barral.
Ferullo, H. (2006). Luces y sombras del pensamiento económico moderno. Buenos Aires, Argentina: unt.
Gallardo, Á. (2007). Políticas distributivas, marxismo de elección racional y marxismo clásico: Un análisis comparativo. rei, 9(17), (s. p.).
Han, B. C. (2014). Psicopolítica. Barcelona, España: Herder Editorial.
Iazetta, O. (2009). Libertad y regulación en una sociedad de mercado: los parecidos de familia en Durkheim y Polanyi. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Scielo.
Morín, E. (2011). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Madrid, España: Gedisa.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, usa: Harvard University Press.
Polanyi K. (2008). La gran transformación. Madrid, España: Quipu Editorial.
Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Planeta.
Stiglitz, J. (2014). El precio de la desigualdad. Barcelona, España: Black Print cpi.