Public space appropriation and neighborhood habitability Urban transformations for social cohesion and sustainability
Main Article Content
Abstract
Public space appropriation and transformation influence the everyday conditions of inhabiting, particularly in areas adjacent to housing, where practices of use, permanence, interaction, and adaptation converge. Although habitability, social cohesion, and sustainability have been widely addressed in urban studies, there remains a need to further examine the relationships between physical-spatial conditions and everyday practices at the immediate scale of residential environments. This article aims to analyze the relationship between practices of public space appropriation and the production of habitability conditions at the neighborhood scale, using the San Pablo Xalpa Housing Unit in Mexico City as an empirical case. A predominantly qualitative mixed-methods approach was employed, based on non-participant observation, documentary analysis, and visual records, complemented by the descriptive systematization of indicators identified across the units of observation. The results show that appropriation practices produce different forms of use, adaptation, and transformation of common spaces, which may expand opportunities for permanence, interaction, and shared use while also generating access restrictions, spatial discontinuities, and tensions between individual and collective uses. Based on these findings, neighborhood habitability is proposed as an analytical category at the meso scale that articulates physical-spatial configuration, appropriation, and social practices in the immediate residential environment.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alvarado Azpeitia, C., Adame Martínez, S., & Sánchez Nájera, R. M. (2017). Habitabilidad urbana en el espacio público, el caso del centro histórico de Toluca, Estado de México. Sociedad y Ambiente, (13). DOI: 10.31840/sya.v2017i13.1758
Ceballos Ramos, O. L., & Tarchópulos Sierra, D. (2003). Calidad de la vivienda dirigida a los sectores de bajos ingresos en Bogotá. Centro Editorial Javeriano.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
Galeana Cruz, S. (2020). Evaluación de satisfacción: espacio público contiguo a la vivienda de interés social. Vivienda y Comunidades Sustentables, (8), 39–58.
DOI: 10.32870/rvcs.v0i8.148
Gao, T., Lim, S., & Yang, F. (2025). Space appropriation and interaction: How to promote social cohesion in high-density urban environments? Cities, 167, 106338.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2025.106338
Gazga Rosales, R. D. (2025). El espacio público en la producción de lo cotidiano: escala barrial en la Barcelona periférica. En J. Gasca Zamora & V. Moctezuma Mendoza (Coords.), Derecho a la ciudad, derecho a la vida: Interacciones, aproximaciones y perspectivas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coordinación de Humanidades, Programa Universitario de Estudios sobre la Ciudad.
DOI del capítulo: 10.22201/puec.9786075876641e.2025.c10
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, (53), 23–40.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1974).
Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press.
Pérez-González, A. (2016). El espacio público en el paradigma de la sustentabilidad social. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio, 16(50), 171–195.
Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: A systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7, 155–212.
DOI: 10.1007/s42413-024-00204-5