De la ambigüedad del mito

Authors

  • Sergio Espinosa Proa Universidad de Zacatecas - México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29166/anales.v1i376.1876

Keywords:

mito, tragedia, fi losofía, psicohistoria.

Abstract

Th is essay addresses the category “myth” from a philosophical approach. Th e author raises understand the myth from the interpretive function
with which the world is built, civilization, language, politics, truth and reason itself. Th e author postulates resume the analysis of myth beyond
the linear readings of historical psychology and theology. Th e myth has a specifi c architecture that presides over the organization of the world, the human and the divine, in all cultures; without it, philosophy itself had not existed. Modernity requires precisely an analysis of myth from its own semantic and pragmatic system. Th e mystery and danger of the irrational not be ignored or fought, you need to understand.

References

Brisson, Luc (2005). Platón, las palabras y los mitos, ¿cómo y por qué Platón dio nombre al mito? Trad. José Ma. Zamora Calvo. Madrid: Abada Editores.
Dodds, E. R. (1981). Los griegos y lo irracional. Trad. M. Araujo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Giqueaux, Eduardo (1979). El mito y la cultura. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Castañeda.
Vernant, Jean-Pierre (1984). Los orígenes del pensamiento griego. Trad. M. Ayerra. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA. ———. (2001). Mito y pensamiento en la Grecia antigua. Trad. J. D. López Bonillo. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.

Published

2019-04-12

Issue

Section

LETRAS Y FILOSOFÍA