Public management: analysis of the development of electronic government in the public administration of Ecuador in the period 2014-2016

Authors

  • Edgar Efraín Osejo Domínguez Universidad de Extremadura
  • Susana Graciela Cadena Vela Central University of Ecuador
  • Mónica del Rocío Noboa Reinoso

Keywords:

Information and Communication Technologies Tics, Electronic Government, National Secretary of Public Administration, CEPAL

Abstract

States at the global level have been making efforts to improve Public Management at all levels, so that the use of Information and Communication Technologies (TIC) has helped to achieve this aim, allowing for better governance, has incorporated the term Electronic Government (GE). In Ecuador, the National Government through the National Secretary of Public Administration (SNAP) had the competence to implement, regulate, advise and support the implementation of GE, currently has the Ministry of Telecommunications and the MINTEL Information Society. The National Electronic Government Plan was generated for the period 2014 - 2017, establishing a legal and regulatory framework that allows compliance with international agreements. The regulatory framework has been institutionalized GE is now a state policy. The research seeks to carry out an evolutionary analysis of the development of GE in public administration in 33 public entities, using the Multi-Dimensional Model of Electronic Government Measurement for Latin America and the Caribbean proposed by CEPAL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Edgar Efraín Osejo Domínguez, Universidad de Extremadura

Ingeniero en Administración de Empresas, Magíster en Gestión de la Calidad y Productividad, PhD. en Economía y Empresa

Susana Graciela Cadena Vela, Central University of Ecuador

Ingeniera en Sistema e Informática, Magister en Educación Superior, PhD. en Informática

Mónica del Rocío Noboa Reinoso

Doctora en Contabilidad y Auditoría, Magister en Gestión Contable

References

Accenture. (2004). eGovernment Leadership: high Performance, Maximun Value: Accenture. New York: Accenture.
CEPAL. (2007). Hacia un modelo multi-dimensional de gobierno electrónico. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
Chevallerau, F. X. (2005). eGovernment in the Member Satates of the European Union. Bruselas: IDABC.
CLAD. (2007). Cartas Iberoamericanas de Gobierno Electronico. Santiago de Chile: ONU.
Concha, Gastón; Naser, Alejandra. (2012). El desafío hacia el gobierno abierto en la hora de la igualdad. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
Asamblea Constituyente. (2008). Constitución Política de la República del Ecuador. Quito: Registro Ofiacial del Ecuador.
DeMaio, C. D., & Frost, M. (2003). Creating a Performance-Based Electronics Government. Arlington: The Performance Institute.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., & Bastow, S. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and E- Government. Oxford: University Press.
Eurostat. (2005). Measuring E-government. Paris.
Gasco, M. (2005). Exploring the E-government Gap in South America. International Journal of Public Administration, 683-701.
Gil Garcia, J. R. (2012). Enacting Electronic Government Success: An Integrative Study of Government-wide Websites, Organizational Capabilities and Institutions. Nueva York: Springer.
Gil García, J., & Criado,J. (2013). Gobierno electrónico, gestión y políticas públicas, estado actual y tendencias futuras en América Latina. Gestión y Politica Pública, 3-48.
------- (2013). Gestion y Política Pública. Mexico: CIDE.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quartely, 122-136.
Luna Reyes, L. F. (2013). Trust and Collaboration in Interorganizational Information Technology Projects in the Public Sector. Gestión y Política Pública, 307-340.
Ministerio Secretaria General de la Presidencia de Chile. (2006). Gobierno electrónico en Chile año 2000-2005. Santiago de Chile: MAVAL LTda.
OCDE. (2005). Gobierno electrónico y su evolución. Madrid: OCDE.
Purón Cid, G. (2013). The Dimensions of Knowledge in E-government adoption. A confirmatory factory Analysis. Gestión y Política Pública.
Sánchez Figueroa, J. (2009). La administración pública en la sociedad de la información: antecedentes de la adopción de las iniciativas de Gobierno Electrónico por los ciudadanos. Madrid: EPN.
Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta.ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 443 - 458.
Stowers, G. N. (2004). Measuring the Performance of E-government. Washington D.C.: The Center for the Business of Government.
Swartz, N. (2004). E-Government Around the World. Information Management Journal, 269-281.
Warketing, M., & Pavlov, P. (2002). Encouraging Citizen Adoption of e-Government by Building Trist. Electronic Markets, 157-

Published

2018-01-16

How to Cite

Osejo Domínguez, E. E., Cadena Vela, S. G., & Noboa Reinoso, M. del R. (2018). Public management: analysis of the development of electronic government in the public administration of Ecuador in the period 2014-2016. Revista Ciencias Sociales, 1(39), 73–93. Retrieved from https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CSOCIALES/article/view/1033

Most read articles by the same author(s)