Structural assessment of the Chemical Engineering Administration Building at Universidad Central Applying the Ecuadorian Building Code (NEC15)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research project focuses on the structural evaluation of the Administration Building of the Faculty of Chemical Engineering at the Central University of Ecuador, emphasizing its seismic vulnerability in accordance with the Ecuadorian Construction Standard (NEC). The building, in operation for 11 years, was built during a transitional regulatory period, making it essential to assess its behavior under severe seismic events. The methodology includes non-destructive tests such as the rebound hammer test (ASTM C-805) to determine concrete strength, and pachometry to locate steel reinforcement. Ambient vibration testing was used to determine the building’s actual fundamental period, which was compared with the results of a modal spectral analysis using structural modeling software. The model was calibrated by incorporating equivalent diagonals to represent the stiffness of existing masonry. Finally, a nonlinear static analysis (Pushover) was conducted using the capacity spectrum method (FEMA 440), enabling the development of the capacity curve and evaluation of structural performance levels. The findings provide insight into the current condition of the structure and offer valuable input for institutional decision-making regarding its continued use or potential retrofitting.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
A. M. Moscoso Vásquez y J. S. Díaz Méndez, «Determinación de la taxonomía, vulnerabilidad estructural y su aplicación,» Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, 2024.
A. Sarria Molina, Capítulo 4: Tectónica global y origen de los sismos, Santiago: Universidad de los Andes, 2003.
P. Quinde Martinez y E. Reinoso Angulo, «Estudio de peligro sísmico de Ecuador y propuesta de espectros de diseño para la ciudad de Cuenca,» Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica No.94 , Quito, 2016.
U. C. d. Ecuador, Facultad de Ingeneiria Quimica, Quito, 2016.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FEMA 356, Washington, D.C: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS, 2000.
Consejo técnico de uso y gestión del suelo, «Parámetros evaluación edificaciones existentes de alta ocurrencia,» Miduvi, Quito, 2020.
Consejo Técnico de Uso y Gestión del Suelo, Parámetros evaluación edificaciones existentes de alta concurrencia, Quito: Resolución Nro.008-CTUGS-2020, 2020.
M. Wathelet, J.-L. Chatelain, C. Cornou, G. Di Giulio, B. Guillier, M. Ohrnberger y A. Savvaidis, «Geopsy: A User-Friendly OpenSource Tool Set for Ambient,» Electronic Seismologist, 2020.
M. D. Braja, Fundamentos de ingeniería geotécnica, California: California State, Sacramento, 1999.
Grypo Taylor y Francis, Craig’s Soil Mechanics, 7ª edición, 2004.
C. Donald, Foundation Design: Principles and Practices, Prentice Hall, 2011.
A. Marinilli, Comparación de modelos numéricos para el análisis sísmico de edificaciones de mampostería confinada, Venezuela: Jornadas de investigación IDEC, 2018.
Norma Ecuatoriana de la Construcción, PELIGRO SÍSMICO DISEÑO SISMORESISTENTE, Quito: Ministro de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda, 2015.
Federal emergency managment agency, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures (FEMA 440), Washington D.C: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2005.
C. A. Capa Ramón y F. G. Guallpa Minchala, «Análisis estático lineal y no lineal de un edificio de hormigón armado,,» Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, 2021.
ASCE/SEI 41-13, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofi t of Existing Buildings, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013.
NEC-SE-HM, ESTRUCTURAS DE HORMIGÓN ARMADO, Quito: Cámara de la Industria de la Construcción, 2015.
A. C. Institute, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19), Farmington Hills: ACI, 2019.
J. Carrillo y G. González, Influencia de la mampostería no reforzada en el comportamiento inelástico de pórticos de concreto, vol. 74, Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2007, pp. 217-227.
F. E. M. A. (FEMA), restandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 356), Washington D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
O. Ozturkoglu, T. Ucar y Y. Yusuf, Effect of masonry infill walls with openings on nonlinear response of reinforced concrete frames, Esmirna: Earthquake and Structures, 2017.
P. Asteris, C. Crysostomou, L. Giannopoulos y E. Smyrou, Masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames with openings, III ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011.
J. Pacheco Muñoz, Calibración estructural basada en vibraciones ambientales y determinación de rangos de error aceptables, Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes, 2022.
N. Molina Narváez, Análisis de la resistencia a la compresión de bloques de concreto usados en la construcción de viviendas en la ciudad de Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Chiapas, 2022.
Federal Emergency Mangment Agency (Fema), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures (FEMA 440), Washington D.C: FEMA, 2005.