Stratified sampling calculation method with proportional allocation to the size for the analysis of consumption, commutation and local identity within the metropolitan district of Quito

Main Article Content

Fernando Puente
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3430-7831
Diego Hurtado
Jenny Morillo
Mayra Díaz
Gabriela Paz

Abstract

Due to the lack of a number of inhabitants at the time of the study in the Metropolitan District of Quito (DMQ), considering ages from them 10 to 65, the study area was delimited taking as base the population Census INEC from the year 2010, through the selection of the census tracts in urban land classification to obtain an approximation of the population size, about 1655073. The study was held by stratified sampling with proportional affixation to the size, considering the Census polygons sub-forming cells throughout the district, a grid composed of 400*400 square meters cells, considered as the walking area, which were analyzed as strata. The total number of cells was 2824. For the stratified division of the Metropolitan District of Quito it was considered the population density of each cell to determine the number of surveys, excluding green areas, parks, ravines, stadiums and large-scale educational facilities, because they do not have population significance. A total of 10503 surveys were georeferenced by the lot identification number as a result. It was determined the weight of the strata within the population universe of the DMQ in urban land, setting the number of surveys that apply within each cell for purposes of the analysis of consumption, commuting and local identity. Particularly it is highlighted the following results: a total of 25 surveys to be applied in 27 cells and 33 surveys in 2 cells, which evidence these spaces as the ones with the highest local density within the DMQ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Puente, F., Hurtado, D., Morillo, J., Díaz, M., & Paz, G. (2017). Stratified sampling calculation method with proportional allocation to the size for the analysis of consumption, commutation and local identity within the metropolitan district of Quito. FIGEMPA: Investigación Y Desarrollo, 3(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.29166/revfig.v1i1.60
Section
Artículos
Author Biographies

Fernando Puente, Universidad Central del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador

Orcid: 0000-0002-3430-7831

Diego Hurtado, Universidad Central del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador

Orcid: 0000-0002-5015-2913

Jenny Morillo, Universidad Central del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador

Orcid: 0000-0001-8963-7291

References

Argibay, J. C. (2009). Muestra en investigación cuantitativa. Subjetividad y procesos cognitivos, http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1852-73102009000100001&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

Bravo, D. N. (2001). Jerarquización urbana funcional y análisis de los patrones de distribución espacial del índice de atracción de los núcleos de población de La Rioja. Berceo, (141), 183–194. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=224571

Esquivel-Cuevas, M., Hernández Mercado, O. A., & Garnica Monrroy, R. (06 de Agosto de 2013). Modelo de Accesibilidad Peatonal (MAP). Bitácora de la Universidad de Colombia-Bogotá, 30.

Gisbert, F. J. G. (2016). Una aproximación volumétrica a la desagregación espacial de la población combinando cartografía temática y datos LIDAR. Working papers = Documentos de trabajo: Serie EC (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas), 1(3). Recuperado a partir de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5617872

Gutiérrez y de la Vara & Namakforoosh (2008). Tamaño de muestras en Estudios Clínicos.

Kish, L. (1972). Muestreo de encuestas (R. Cruz López, Trad.) México: Trillas.

Mariani, G. (19 de Marzo de 2013). Las dimensiones del Urbanismo: espacio, densidad, tiempo y distancia. La civdad viva, 35.

Casal, J., Mateu, E. (2003). Tamaño de la Muestra. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, http://optimierung.mathematik.uni-kl.de/mamaeusch/ veroeffentlichungen/ver_texte/sampling_es.pdf

Murray, S. (1988). Estadística (2° ed.). Madrid: McGraw Hill.

Ostle, B. (1974). Técnicas de la Estadística Moderna, Cuándo y dónde aplicarlas (cuarta ed.). México: Editorial Limusa.

Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W., & Ott, L. (s.f.). Elementos de muestreo (G. Rendón Sánchez, & J. R. Gómez Aguilar, Trads.) Chapingo, México: Grupo Editorial Iberoamericano.

Sistema de bibliotecas EPN Koha › Detalles para: Fortalecimiento de centralidades urbanas de Quito (s. f.). http://biblioteca.epn.edu.ec/cgi-bin/koha/opacdetail.pl?biblionumber=23514&shelfbrowse_itemnumber=31169

Spiegel, M. R., & Stephens, L. J. (2002). Estadística (Tercera ed.) (L. E. Pineda Ayala, Trad.) México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Triola, M. F. (2006). Estadística (Novena ed.) (P. M. Guerrero Rosas, Ed.) México: Pearson.

Talavera, J. O., & Rivas-Ruiz, R. (2013). Pertinencia de la prueba estadística. IV Relevance of Statistical Tests, 51, S30–S34. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=97004210&lang=es&site=ehost-live

Unidas, N. (2009). Diseño de muestras para encuestas de hogares Directrices prácticas. New York.

Institute for Transportation and Development Polic (2003). Tod Standard. Investigación, New York.