La evaluación seminal y su utilidad práctica en la toma de decisiones en tratamientos de reproducción humana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/rfcmq.v43i2.2832Keywords:
semen analysis, reproductive advice, infertilityAbstract
The correct evaluation of semen is essential for good reproductive advice; The seminal analysis performed in assisted reproduction centers is multifunctional and includes the assessment of the fertile potential that allows choosing the most convenient assisted reproduction procedure for the patient, directs additional tests to establish the causes of male infertility and guarantees the safety of the use of seminal samples for reproductive purposes. The objective of the document is to explain the role, advantages, limitations of semen analysis and its application in the reproductive council, according to current guidelines.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation
of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015; 103(3):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103.
Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem 2018;
:2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012.
Schjenken JE, Robertson SA. Seminal fluid signalling in the female reproductive tract: implications
for reproductive success and offspring health. Adv Exp Med Biol 2015; 868:127-58. doi: 10.1007/978-
-319-18881-2_6
Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Gordon Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World
Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2010;
(3):231-245.
Garrido Nicolás. Presente y futuro de la evaluación del semen con finalidad reproductiva. Rev Iberoam Fert Rep Hum 2014; 31:10-20.
Leushuis E, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Repping S, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW, Hompes PG, van der
Veen F. Semen analysis and prediction of natural conception. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(7):1360-7. doi:
1093/humrep/deu082
Crawford NM, Steiner AZ. Age-related infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015; 42(1):15-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.09.005
Hunault CC, Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ, Collins JA, Evers JL, te Velde ER. Two new prediction rules
for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of
three previous models. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(9):2019-26. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh365
The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators. Hum Reprod Open 2017; 2017(2):hox011. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox011
Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O,
Banker M, Adamson GD. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies World Report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod 2016;
(7):1588-609. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew082
Portella Jimmy, López Rosmary, Noriega-Hoces Luis, Guzmán Luis. Modelo predictivo de fragmentación de ADN espermático usando parámetros evaluados en un espermatograma. Rev Peru Ginecol
Obstet 2014; 60(1)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Maiella Luna Prieto, Carolina Aguagüiña Veloz, William Guamán Gualpa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
