Analgesia y seguridad de bupivacaína sin epinefrina al 0,125% vs 0,25% en anestesia epidural durante el parto por cesárea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/rfcmq.v41i2.2846Keywords:
arterial pressure, bupivacaine, cesarean section, drug-related side effects and adverse reactions, safetyAbstract
Context: In caesarean section, bupivacaine at 0.125% or 0.25% without epinephrine is used in epidural anesthesia. A higher dose is associated with greater analgesia and a greater frequency of adverse effects. Objective: evaluate the analgesia level and safety of bupivacaine without epinephrine (0.125% or 0.25%) used in cesarean section, in order to recommend the appropriate concentration for this procedure. Subjects and methods: prospective cohort performed on 100 patients undergoing caesarean section at Enrique Sotomayor Gyneco-Obstetric Hospital (October 2015 to January 2016). The population was stratified into two cohorts or groups: A (0.125% bupivacaine) and B (0.25%). Results: two groups of 50 patients were formed. Hypotension was detected in group B (p <0.001) and greater variation in heart rate. In group A, the motor block was maintained at a lower dorsal level (T3) compared to group B (T2) (p <0.001). Regarding the sensory block, the median level of dorsal block was similar in both groups. In group A, 25 patients (50%) were registered who presented adverse effects with respect to group B where there was an adverse effect in 45 cases (90%). Hypotension occurred in 4/50 cases of group A and 16/50 cases of group B (p <0.001). Conclusion: Bupivacaine without 0.125% or 0.25% epinephrine provides similar analgesic results, although the former is significantly related to a lower frequency of adverse effects, especially hypotension (p <0.001), this concentration being recommended for epidural anesthesia during labor due to Caesarean section.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Boletín Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (ETES) Ecuador. Quito; 2014.
Kuczkowski K. Tendencias y avances actuales en anestesia obstétrica: la técnica combinada espinal-epidural para analgesia ambulatoria en trabajo de parto TT. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2006; 34:177–83. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-33472006000300006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Rodríguez Ginarte T, Vidal Machado D. Anestesia epidural y anestesia espinal en pacientes cesareadas. Multimed 2013; 17(2):1–13.
Pineda E, Luz de Alvarado E. Metodología de la investigación. 3ed. Ed Organización Panamericana
de la Salud, Washington; 2008.
Prince AR, Amaya R, Alger J, Sierra M. Anestesia regional: casos complicados y factores asociados,
Hospital Escuela Universitario, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, 2012-2013. Rev Med Hondur 2015; 83:2012–3
Henrique L, Ferraro C, Takeda A, Fernando L, Rezende AH, Sadatsune EJ. Determination of the minimum effective volume of 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Brazilian J Anesthesiol 2014; 64(1):49–53. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.014
Lopez AM, et al. Axillary brachial plexus block duration with mepivacaine in patients with chronic renal failure. Case-control study. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2017. doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2016.09.011
Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research en: Chapman & Hall/CRC
Biostatistics Series, 2ed. New York; 2007; p 89.
López-Espinosa N, Ortiz-Martínez N, Mirabal Rodríguez C. Anestesia espinal con bupivacaína 0,5%
en la cesárea de urgencia. Mediciego 2011; Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/mediciego/mdc-2011/mdcs111n.pdf
Hernández Sampieri R. Metodología de la investigación. Pilar Baptista L (ed). Ed ECOE Ediciones,
México 2010.
Santiago R, Posi G, Ogas M, Dicuadro N, González-Vélez M. Uso comparativo de bupivacaína vs.
ropivacaína peridural asociados a fentanilo en cesárea. Rev Arg Anest 2002; 60(4):209–26.
Rodríguez Ramón R, Márquez González H, Jiménez Báez MV, Iparrea Ramos IC. Eficacia analgésica
entre dos concentraciones de bupivacaína en mujeres en trabajo de parto. Ensayo clínico controlado
aleatorizado triple ciego. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2015; 43(3):179–85.
Delgado R, José J, Mojica B, Julio M, Bello P, Helena A. ¿Dosis bajas de bupivacaina subaracnoidea
reducen la incidencia de hipotensión durante la cesárea? Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2004; 32(3):171–7.
Tejada Perdomo J. Comparación de la eficacia analgésica al administrar “low dose”de bupivacaína
más fentanilo vs bupivacaína a dosis convencional más fentanil en anestesia subaracnoidea para cesárea en pacientes ASA II en el Hospital Universitario Hernando Moncaleano Perdo, Neiva. Universidad Surcolombiana; 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Nelly Díaz-Perez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.