Gobernanza en la era COVID -19: Expectativas sobre los servicios de agua
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El sistema de cogestión y coadministración de los servicios públicos conocido como gobernanza ha sido ampliamente discutido en cuanto a sus dimensiones, pero hasta el momento no se ha establecido un análisis del proceso. Este es el caso de la relación entre gobernabilidad y elecciones. Es en la contienda electoral donde se inicia el conflicto entre los partidos por las preferencias, intenciones de voto y votos del electorado. Los gobernantes proponen aumentos de tarifas para quienes puedan pagarlas, pero sugieren subsidios y condonaciones para sectores vulnerables. Las diferencias entre gobernantes y gobernados revelan una gobernabilidad esperada por las partes involucradas. El objetivo de este trabajo ha sido confirmar la estructura factorial reportada en la literatura. Se realizaron dos estudios, uno exploratorio y otro confirmatorio, durante las elecciones de 2021 en el contexto de la pandemia de la Ciudad de México. Se estableció la estructura factorial de la Escala de Gobernanza Esperada de Carreón (2020), estableciendo tres factores: resolución esperada, percepciones de acuerdos y expectativas de responsabilidades, aunque el diseño de la investigación limitó los hallazgos a la muestra de análisis, sugiriendo la extensión del modelo a otros factores moderadores como el liderazgo.
Descargas
Métricas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Citas
Aguilar, L.F. (2017). The future of public management and governance after the crisis. Frontera Norte, 22(43), pp. 187–213. doi:10.17428/rfn.v22i43.876.
Anguiano de Miguel, A. (2016). Urban Policies and Sustainability in China. Cheap. Castilian-La Mancha Magazine of Social Sciences, (21), pp. 111-130. https://doi.org/10.20932/barataria.v0i21.296
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Field of power, intellectual field. Itinerary of a concept. Buenos Aires: Montrésor.
Bourdieu, P. (2007). The practical sense. Buenos Aires, XXI Century. https://www.icmujeres.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Bordieu%20-%20El%20sentido%20pr%C3%A1ctico-3_compressed.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The strategies of social reproduction. Buenos Aires: XXI Century http://www.redmovimientos.mx/2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Las-Estrategias-de-La-Reproduccion-Social-Pierre-Bourdieu.pdf
Brites, W. (2012). Habitat adversities in housing complexes of relocated population. Teolinda, Bolívar and Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat. (pp. 121-142). Quito: CLACSO
Bustos, J.M., Quintero, M.L., García, C. & Aguilar, J.A. (2018). Governance of local sustainability: Indices of water mediatization for Mexico City. Tlatemoani, 24, pp. 1-10
Carreón, J. (2020). Governance of water sustainability. Mexico: UNAM.ENTS
Carreón, J., Hernández, J. & García, C. (2014). Empirical evidence of an agenda setting model. University Law, 24 (3), pp. 50-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.15174.au.2014.598
Cravino, M. (2012). Inhabiting new neighborhoods of social interest in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires: the space built by the State and lived by the neighbors. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions from the popular Mexican habitat, pp. 101-120. Quito: CLACSO
Cueva, S. (2012). Public space as a right of the city. A tour of the heritage of the historic center of Quito. In Teolinda, Bolívar and Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 267-294. Quito: CLACSO
Gallardo Hernández, L. F. (2020). Towards a sustainable city. Art & Design Magazine, 15 (02), pp. 24-31. Doi: 10.15665/ad.v15i02.1158. http://ojs.uac.edu.co/index.php/arte-diseno/article/view/1158
Gissi, N. & Soto, P. (2010). From stigmatization to neighborhood pride: Appropriation of space and social integration of the Mixtec population in a neighborhood in Mexico City. INV, 68, pp. 99-118
Guillén, A. (2010). Perspectives on the environment in Venezuela. UCAB notebooks, 10, pp. 29-55
Hudson, A. & Florez, J. (2021). Recent advances towards open fiscal governance in Latin America. Nóesis Journal of Social Sciences, 28(56), pp. 1–21. doi: 10.20983/noesis.2019.2.2.
Iglesias, A. (2010). Strategic planning as an instrument of public management in local governments: case analysis. Management Notebooks, 10, pp. 101-120
Lefebvre, H. (1974). The production of space. Australian: Blackwell Publishing.
Lefebvre, P. (1980). Presence and absence. Contributions to the theories of representations. México: FCE. https://didacticaproyectual.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/henri-lefebvre-la-presencia-y-la-ausencia-1941.pdf
Lefebvre, H. (2013). The production of space. Madrid: Captain swing https://istoriamundial.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/henri-lefebvre-la-produccion-del-espacio.pdf
Loyola, C. & Rivas, J. (2010). Analysis of sustainability indicators for their application in the city. Time and space, 25, pp. 1-15
Malmod, A. (2011). Logic of occupation in the conformation of the territory. Territory planning as a planning tool. Ibero-American Magazineof Urbanism, 6, pp. 18-30
Martinez, N. & Espejel, I. (2015). Research on governance in Mexico and its environmental applicability. Economy, Society and Territory, pp. 153-183. doi :10.22136/est002015557.
Marx, K. (2014). The fetishism of the commodity. La Rioja: Canabaza Nuggets https://geopolitica.iiec.unam.mx/sites/geopolitica.iiec.unam.mx/files/2017-09/Marx%20El%20fetichismo%20de%20las%20mercancias.pdf
Melgarejo-Moreno, J. & López-Ortiz, M.I. (2016). Waste water Treatment and Water Reuse in Spain. Agua Y Territorio / Water and Landscape, (8), pp. 22–35. https://doi.org/10.17561/at.v0i8.3293
Molini, F. & Salgado, M. (2010). Artificial surface and single-family homes in Spain, within the debate between compact city and dispersed city. Bulletin of the Association of Spanish Geographers, 54, pp. 125-147
Nacif, N., Martinet, M. & Espinosa, M. (2011). Between Idealization and Pragmatism: Plans for the Reconstruction of the City of San Juan, Argentina. Ibero-American Magazineof Urbanism, 6, pp. 5-17
Nozica, G. (2011). Territorial integration plan. Desirable scenarios for the insertion of the province of San Juan into Mercosur. Magazine Ibero-American Urbanism, 6, pp. 43-54
Orostegui, K. & Matos, A. (2009). Behavior of household solid waste generation in the Chaclayo district. Journal of University Research, 1, pp. 44-51
Pallares, G. (2012). Right to the city: homeless people in the city of Buenos Aires. In Teolinda, Bolivar and Erazo, J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 171-186. Quito: CLACSO
Paniagua, L. (2012). Urban disputes: space and differentiation in the neighborhood. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 245-266. Quito: CLACSO
Perez, G. (2010). Financing of urban-ecological projects through the exchange of carbon bonds. Urban, 22, pp. 7-21
Santamaria, R., (2012). The accreditation of the need for housing as a requirement for the transformation of rural land. Reduced, 10, pp. 193-206
Scallop, N. (2012). Popular housing and public security: the pacification process of the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 143-164. Quito: CLACSO
Sen, A. (1989). On ethics and economics. Madrid: Alianza Editorial https://www.alianzaeditorial.es/primer_capitulo/sobre-etica-y-economia.pdf
Sen, A. (2000). Development and freedom. México: Planeta https://eva.fcs.edu.uy/pluginfile.php/69180/course/section/7664/Sen_Desarrollo_y_Libertad_intro_cap1_y_2.pdf
Sen, A. (2011). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Soto-Vazquez, R., Záyago Lau, E. & Maldonado López, L. (2021). Governance of nanomedicine: a systematic review. Mundo Nano. Interdisciplinary Journal in Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, 15(28), pp. 1e-25e. doi: 10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2022.28.69682.
Urquieta, M. & Campillo, C. (2012). The feminine representations of the urban space _ New demands for the democratic and inclusive construction of the city. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 311-330. Quito: CLACSO
Verisimo, A. (2012). Program for the regulation and formation of capital gains in informal urbanizations. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 45-68. Quito: CLACSO
Wickson, F. (2015). Nanotech Governance: Why We Can't Trust Scientific Risk Assessments. Nano World. Interdisciplinary Journal in Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, 4(1). doi:10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2011.1.50988.