Governance in the COVID -19 era: Expectations on water services

Main Article Content

Javier Carreón-Guillén
José Marcos Bustos-Aguayo
Francisco Rubén Sandoval-Vázquez
Margarita Juárez-Nájera
Cruz García-Lirios

Abstract

The system of co-management and co-administration of public services known as governance has been widely discussed in terms of its dimensions, but so far, no analysis of the process has been established. This is the case of the relationship between governance and elections. It is in the electoral contest where the conflict between the parties begins due to the preferences, intentions to vote and votes of the electorate. The rulers propose increases in rates for those who can pay them, but suggest subsidies and forgiveness for vulnerable sectors. The differences between the rulers and the ruled reveal a governance expected by the parties involved. The objective of this work has been to confirm the factorial structure reported in the literature. Two studies, one exploratory and one confirmatory, were conducted during the 2021 elections in the context of the Mexico City pandemic. The factorial structure of the Expected Governance Scale of Carreón (2020) was established, establishing three factors: expected resolution, perceptions of agreements and expectations of responsibilities, although the research design limited the findings to the analysis sample, suggesting the extension of the model to other moderating factors such as leadership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Carreón-Guillén, J., Bustos-Aguayo, J. M., Sandoval-Vázquez, F. R., Juárez-Nájera, . M. ., & García-Lirios, C. (2022). Governance in the COVID -19 era: Expectations on water services. FIGEMPA: Investigación Y Desarrollo, 14(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.29166/revfig.v14i2.3525
Section
Artículos
Author Biographies

Javier Carreón-Guillén, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México - México.

Profesor Investigador, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Escuela Nacional de Trabajo Social: javierg@unam.mx https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-0958 

José Marcos Bustos-Aguayo, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México - México.

Profesor Investigador, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza: marcos.bustos@unam.mx https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-596X 

Francisco Rubén Sandoval-Vázquez, Universidad Autónoma de Morelos - México.

Profesor Investigador, Universidad Autónoma de Morelos, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuatla: fsandoval@uaem.mx https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-7197 

Margarita Juárez-Nájera, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - México.

Profesora Investigadora, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Azcapotzalco:  mjn@azc.uam.mx https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-8213

Cruz García-Lirios, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México - México.

Profesor Investigador, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Unidad Académica Profesional Huehuetoca: cgarciali@uaemex.mx 

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-6796

References

Aguilar, L.F. (2017). The future of public management and governance after the crisis. Frontera Norte, 22(43), pp. 187–213. doi:10.17428/rfn.v22i43.876.

Anguiano de Miguel, A. (2016). Urban Policies and Sustainability in China. Cheap. Castilian-La Mancha Magazine of Social Sciences, (21), pp. 111-130. https://doi.org/10.20932/barataria.v0i21.296

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Field of power, intellectual field. Itinerary of a concept. Buenos Aires: Montrésor.

Bourdieu, P. (2007). The practical sense. Buenos Aires, XXI Century. https://www.icmujeres.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Bordieu%20-%20El%20sentido%20pr%C3%A1ctico-3_compressed.pdf

Bourdieu, P. (2011). The strategies of social reproduction. Buenos Aires: XXI Century http://www.redmovimientos.mx/2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Las-Estrategias-de-La-Reproduccion-Social-Pierre-Bourdieu.pdf

Brites, W. (2012). Habitat adversities in housing complexes of relocated population. Teolinda, Bolívar and Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat. (pp. 121-142). Quito: CLACSO

Bustos, J.M., Quintero, M.L., García, C. & Aguilar, J.A. (2018). Governance of local sustainability: Indices of water mediatization for Mexico City. Tlatemoani, 24, pp. 1-10

Carreón, J. (2020). Governance of water sustainability. Mexico: UNAM.ENTS

Carreón, J., Hernández, J. & García, C. (2014). Empirical evidence of an agenda setting model. University Law, 24 (3), pp. 50-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.15174.au.2014.598

Cravino, M. (2012). Inhabiting new neighborhoods of social interest in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires: the space built by the State and lived by the neighbors. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions from the popular Mexican habitat, pp. 101-120. Quito: CLACSO

Cueva, S. (2012). Public space as a right of the city. A tour of the heritage of the historic center of Quito. In Teolinda, Bolívar and Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 267-294. Quito: CLACSO

Gallardo Hernández, L. F. (2020). Towards a sustainable city. Art & Design Magazine, 15 (02), pp. 24-31. Doi: 10.15665/ad.v15i02.1158. http://ojs.uac.edu.co/index.php/arte-diseno/article/view/1158

Gissi, N. & Soto, P. (2010). From stigmatization to neighborhood pride: Appropriation of space and social integration of the Mixtec population in a neighborhood in Mexico City. INV, 68, pp. 99-118

Guillén, A. (2010). Perspectives on the environment in Venezuela. UCAB notebooks, 10, pp. 29-55

Hudson, A. & Florez, J. (2021). Recent advances towards open fiscal governance in Latin America. Nóesis Journal of Social Sciences, 28(56), pp. 1–21. doi: 10.20983/noesis.2019.2.2.

Iglesias, A. (2010). Strategic planning as an instrument of public management in local governments: case analysis. Management Notebooks, 10, pp. 101-120

Lefebvre, H. (1974). The production of space. Australian: Blackwell Publishing.

Lefebvre, P. (1980). Presence and absence. Contributions to the theories of representations. México: FCE. https://didacticaproyectual.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/henri-lefebvre-la-presencia-y-la-ausencia-1941.pdf

Lefebvre, H. (2013). The production of space. Madrid: Captain swing https://istoriamundial.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/henri-lefebvre-la-produccion-del-espacio.pdf

Loyola, C. & Rivas, J. (2010). Analysis of sustainability indicators for their application in the city. Time and space, 25, pp. 1-15

Malmod, A. (2011). Logic of occupation in the conformation of the territory. Territory planning as a planning tool. Ibero-American Magazineof Urbanism, 6, pp. 18-30

Martinez, N. & Espejel, I. (2015). Research on governance in Mexico and its environmental applicability. Economy, Society and Territory, pp. 153-183. doi :10.22136/est002015557.

Marx, K. (2014). The fetishism of the commodity. La Rioja: Canabaza Nuggets https://geopolitica.iiec.unam.mx/sites/geopolitica.iiec.unam.mx/files/2017-09/Marx%20El%20fetichismo%20de%20las%20mercancias.pdf

Melgarejo-Moreno, J. & López-Ortiz, M.I. (2016). Waste water Treatment and Water Reuse in Spain. Agua Y Territorio / Water and Landscape, (8), pp. 22–35. https://doi.org/10.17561/at.v0i8.3293

Molini, F. & Salgado, M. (2010). Artificial surface and single-family homes in Spain, within the debate between compact city and dispersed city. Bulletin of the Association of Spanish Geographers, 54, pp. 125-147

Nacif, N., Martinet, M. & Espinosa, M. (2011). Between Idealization and Pragmatism: Plans for the Reconstruction of the City of San Juan, Argentina. Ibero-American Magazineof Urbanism, 6, pp. 5-17

Nozica, G. (2011). Territorial integration plan. Desirable scenarios for the insertion of the province of San Juan into Mercosur. Magazine Ibero-American Urbanism, 6, pp. 43-54

Orostegui, K. & Matos, A. (2009). Behavior of household solid waste generation in the Chaclayo district. Journal of University Research, 1, pp. 44-51

Pallares, G. (2012). Right to the city: homeless people in the city of Buenos Aires. In Teolinda, Bolivar and Erazo, J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 171-186. Quito: CLACSO

Paniagua, L. (2012). Urban disputes: space and differentiation in the neighborhood. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 245-266. Quito: CLACSO

Perez, G. (2010). Financing of urban-ecological projects through the exchange of carbon bonds. Urban, 22, pp. 7-21

Santamaria, R., (2012). The accreditation of the need for housing as a requirement for the transformation of rural land. Reduced, 10, pp. 193-206

Scallop, N. (2012). Popular housing and public security: the pacification process of the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 143-164. Quito: CLACSO

Sen, A. (1989). On ethics and economics. Madrid: Alianza Editorial https://www.alianzaeditorial.es/primer_capitulo/sobre-etica-y-economia.pdf

Sen, A. (2000). Development and freedom. México: Planeta https://eva.fcs.edu.uy/pluginfile.php/69180/course/section/7664/Sen_Desarrollo_y_Libertad_intro_cap1_y_2.pdf

Sen, A. (2011). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

Soto-Vazquez, R., Záyago Lau, E. & Maldonado López, L. (2021). Governance of nanomedicine: a systematic review. Mundo Nano. Interdisciplinary Journal in Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, 15(28), pp. 1e-25e. doi: 10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2022.28.69682.

Urquieta, M. & Campillo, C. (2012). The feminine representations of the urban space _ New demands for the democratic and inclusive construction of the city. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 311-330. Quito: CLACSO

Verisimo, A. (2012). Program for the regulation and formation of capital gains in informal urbanizations. In Teolinda, Bolívar & Erazo J. (coord.). Dimensions of the Mexican popular habitat, pp. 45-68. Quito: CLACSO

Wickson, F. (2015). Nanotech Governance: Why We Can't Trust Scientific Risk Assessments. Nano World. Interdisciplinary Journal in Nanosciences and Nanotechnology, 4(1). doi:10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2011.1.50988.