Wear of the enamel by different chemical and mechanical treatments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol21.n2.2019-51-66Keywords:
Dental enamel, dental polishing / methods, dental enamel / drug effects, enamel microabrasion / methods, ir abrasionAbstract
Introduction: Microabrasion is described as a procedure performed on tooth enamel in which the use of an acidic agent and an abrasive agent can correct surface chromatic alterations. Some studies show how the parameters of time, number of applications and the pressure exerted influence the amount of enamel removed.Objective: To establish the thickness of tooth enamel removed according to the abrasive capacity of 9 mechanical chemical treatments, using stereomicroscopy. Materials and methods: With the endorsement of the ethics committee of the School of Dentistry of the National University of Colombia, 90 third molars were collected under informed consent and kept stored under the parameters of ISO 11405. Acrylic blocks were fixed the lingual halves of the dental crowns, creating on them flat surfaces by means of series of sandpaper with irrigation and taking impressions with silicone of addition.They were distributed randomly in 9 groups (n 10). Each group was treated for a period of 30 seconds: G1: Opalustre® (Ultradent), G2: Pumice and 37% phosphoric acid (Ultra-Etch®, Ultradent), G3: Pumice, glycerin and phosphoric acid 37 % (Ultra-Etch®, Ultradent), G4: Yellow halo strawberries (Komet), G5: White halo strawberries (Komet), G6: Sof-Lex® discs (3M), yellow color, G7: Sof-Lex discs ® (3M), yellow and light yellow, G8: Sandblasted, and G9: Perfect Margin ultrasonic tips (Acteon). The wear thickness created was measured using a stereo microscope with an increase of 10X. The collected data were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis tests (p≤0.05) to compare all groups and the Mann-Whitney U test (p≤0.05) for individual comparisons. Results: Regardless of the treatment performed, all groups presented enamel wear. The highest wear was recorded for the group treated with yellow halo strawberry (122.66 ± 22.64µm) and the lowest wear for the sandblasting group (11.5 ± 2.36µm). There was a statistically significant difference between all groups. Conclusions: Under the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded: The greatest microabrasion in enamel was produced with strawberries of extra-fine grain (yellow halo) and the least wear occurred with sandblasting.
Downloads
References
McCloskey, RJ. A technique for removal of fluorosis stains. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1984. 109(1), 63–64.
Álvarez M, Quiroz K, Rodriguez V, Castelo RM. Dental microabrasion in children: An esthetic alternative. Odontol. Sanmarquina. 2009; 12(2): 86-89
Croll TP, Cavanaugh R. Enamel color modification by controlled hydrochloric acid and pumice abrasion. Quintessence Int. 1986; 7 (2): 26-28.
Mondelli J, Mondelli RFL, Bastos MT, Franco EB. Microabrasão com ácido fosfórico. Rev. bras. de Odont.1995. 52(3): 20-22.
Meireles SS, Andre Dde A, Leida FL, Bocangel JS, Demarco FF. Surface roughness and enamel loss with two microabrasion techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009;10:58–65.
Bertacci A, Lucchese A, Taddei P, Gherlone EF, Chersoni S. Enamel structural changes induced by hydrochoric and phosphoric acid treatment. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2014;12(3):240 -247.
Ardu S, Benbachir, Sttavridakis M, Dietshi D, Krejci, Feilzer. A combined chemo-mechanical approach for aestetic managemof superficial enamel defects. A British Dental Journal. 2009;206(4): 205-208.
Tong LSM, Pang MKM, Mok NYC, King NM, Wei SHY. The effects of etching, micro-abrasion, and bleaching of surface enamel. Journal of Dental Restauration.1993;72(1):67-71.
Agudelo LJ. Efecto de dos sistemas de microabrasión en el espesor del esmalte dental. [Tesis]. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. 2017.
van Waveren Hogervorst WL, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000;117(1):20-6.
Pini NIP, Costa R, Bertoldo CE, Aguiar FH, Lovadino JR, D Alves. Enamel morphology after microabrasion with experimental compounds. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(2):170–175.
Lambrechts P, Mattar D, De Muck J, Bergmans L, Peumans M, Vanherle G, Van Merrbeeck B. Air-abrasion enamel microsurgery to treat enamel White spot lesions of traumatic origin. Masters of esthetic dentistry. 2002. 14 (3) 167-187.
Sundfeld RH, Briso ALF, Mauro SJ. Smile recovery. IV. External whitening of traumatized teeth. J Bras Clin Estet Odontol 2000;5:29-35.
Rodrigues MC, Mondelli RFL, Oliveira GU, Franco EB, Baseggio W, Wang L. Minimal alterations on the enamel surface by micro-abrasion: in vitro roughness and wear assessments. J. Appl. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2013. [cited 2018 Oct 20] ; 21 (2): 112-117.
Paic M, Sener B, Schug J, Schmidlin PR. Effects of microabrasion on substance loss, surface roughness, and colorimetric changes on enamel in vitro. Quintessence International. 39 (6): 517-522.
Bertoldo C, Lima D, Fragoso L, Ambrosano G, Aguiar F, Lovadino J. Evaluation of the effect of different methods of microabrasion and polishing on surface roughness of dental enamel. Indian J Dent Res. 2014 May-Jun;25(3):290-3
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Juan Norberto Calvo Ramírez, Lina María Arango
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.