Microfiltration between glass ionomer and composite resin in non-carious class-v injuries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol22.n1.2020-66-81

Keywords:

Dental filtration, dental marginal adaptation, composite resins, Vitreous Ionomer Cement, Dental Cavity Linning

Abstract

No standards have been established for the treatment of non-carious cervical cavities; a suitable biomaterial will allow good adaptation and longevity of the restoration. Objective: To determine microfiltration in non-carious class V cavities restored with glass ionomer and nanoparticulate resin. Materials and methods: Class V cavities made on the vestibular surface of 80 healthy premolars (1.5 mm deep x 3 mm high in the occlusion-gingival direction x 2 mm wide in the mesio-distal direction) were randomly restored with two biomaterials (n = 40): 1) glass ionomer and 2) nano-filled resin. Then, the specimens were isolated with varnish and immersed in methylene blue for 24 hours. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling for 8 hours and 45 minutes with thermal changes of 37°, 72° and 75° C, each cycle with a duration of 17 seconds. The samples were washed with distilled water and sectioned longitudinally to determine the degree of microfiltration using a stereoscope (Leica M60 Biosystems). Categorical data were analyzed with the Chi2 test in SPSS 24®. Results: It was observed that filtration is significantly lower in resin than in those restored with glass ionomers (p < 0.001). However, none of the restoration materials tested were able to seal the margins or walls of the teeth completely. Conclusion: As a result of the present experiment, it is determined that class V restorations sealed with nano-filled resin have less marginal microfiltration than those restored with glass ionomer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eliana Carolina Morillo-Cárdenas

Clínica Prosmile, Hospital Metropolitano e Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Ecuador

Jennyfer M. García Cárdenas

Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador

María Elena Flores-Araque

Clínica Prosmile, Hospital Metropolitano e Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Ecuado

César Paz-y-Miño

Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador.

Paola E. Leon

Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador

References

Yang S, Lee H, Jin S-H. A combined approach to non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession. Restor Dent Endod. 2016;41(3):218.

Perez CDR, Gonzalez MR, Prado NAS, de Miranda MSF, Macêdo M de A, Fernandes BMP. Restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:687058.

Memarpour M, Derafshi R, Razavi M. Comparison of microleakage from stainless steel crowns margins used with different restorative materials: An in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016;13(1):7–12.

Naik V-K, Jacob C-A, Nainar D-A. Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(4):e397–402.

Carlo B, Barabanti N, Piccinelli G, Faus-Matoses V, Cerutti A. Microbiological characterization and effect of resin composites in cervical lesions. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(1):e40–5.

Lanata EJ. Operatoria Dental. 1st ed. Buenos Aires; 2003. 322 p.

Luong E, Shayegan A. Assessment of microleakage of class V restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following Er:YAG laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:83–92.

Sadeghi M, Davari A, Lynch CD. The effect of re-bonding using surface sealant or adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013;10(5):596–601.

Nematollahi H, Bagherian A, Ghazvini K, Esmaily H, Mehr MA. Microbial microleakage assessment of class V cavities restored with different materials and techniques: A laboratory study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017;14(5):344–50.

Lee JJ, Nettey-Marbell A, Cook A, Pimenta LAF, Leonard R, Ritter A V. Using Extracted Teeth for Research: The Effect of Storage Medium and Sterilization on Dentin Bond Strengths. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(12):1599–603.

Gupta J, Thomas MS, Radhakrishna M, Srikant N, Ginjupalli K. Effect of silver diamine fluoride-potassium iodide and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity cleansers on the bond strength and microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(2):201–6.

Selvaraj K, Sampath V, Sujatha V, Mahalaxmi S. Evaluation of microshear bond strength and nanoleakage of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives to dentin pretreated with silver diamine fluoride/potassium iodide: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27(4):421.

Hernández M. Aspectos prácticos de la adhesión a dentina. Av Odontoestomatol. 2004;6(1):19–32.

Jordehi AY, Shahabi MS, Akbari A. Comparison of self-adhering flowable composite microleakage with several types of bonding agent in class V cavity restoration. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16(4):257–63.

Sooraparaju SG, Kanumuru PK, Nujella SK, Konda KR, Reddy KBK, Penigalapati S. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:1–4.

Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta PK, Tejolatha B, Lakhani AA, Tiwari R, et al. Evaluation of Microleakage with Total Etch, Self Etch and Universal Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations: An In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):ZC53–6.

Bollu IP, Hari A, Thumu J, Velagula LD, Bolla N, Varri S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage Between Nano-Ionomer, Giomer and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Cavities-CLSM Study. J Clin Diagnostic Res JCDR. 2016;10(5):ZC66.

Kumar U, Dharmani CKK, Singh S, Logani A, Shah N. Effect of Air Abrasion Preconditioning on Microleakage in Class V Restorations Under Cyclic Loading: An In-vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 May;8(5):ZC29-32.

Sharafeddin F, Yousefi H, Modiri S, Tondari A, Safaee Jahromi S. Microleakage of Posterior Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts Using two Adhesives after Aging. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2013;14(143):90–5.

Bortolotto T, Betancourt F, Krejci I. Marginal integrity of resin composite restorations restored with PPD initiatorcontaining resin composite cured by QTH, monowave and polywave LED units. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(6):869–75.

Yoshimine N, Shimadab Y, Tagami J, Sadr A. Interfacial Adaptation of Composite Restorations Before and After Light Curing: Effects of Adhesive and Filling Technique. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(4):329–36.

Al-Agha EI, Alagha MI. Nanoleakage of Class V Resin Restorations Using Two Nanofilled Adhesive Systems. J Int Oral Heal. 2015;7(7):6–11.

Mamaladze M, Khutsishvili L, Zarkua E. Distribution of carious and non-carious cervical lesions and gingival recession at age related aspects. Georgian medical news. Georgian Med News. 2016;7–8(256–257):18–22.

Casselli DSM, Faria-E-Silva AL, Casselli H, Martins LRM. Marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations submitted to thermal and mechanical cycling. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Feb;21(1):68–73.

Doozandeh M, Shafiei F, Alavi M. Microleakage of Three Types of Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations: Effect of CPP-ACP Paste Tooth Pretreatment. J Dent (Shiraz, Iran). 2015;16(3):182–8.

Pereira J-R, Júnior L-C, Só M-V-R, Júnior N-F. Effect of thermocycling and varying polymerization techniques on the restorative interface of class V cavities restored with different composite resin systems. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3):e405–9.

Mozaffari HR, Ehteshami A, Zallaghi F, Chiniforush N, Moradi Z. Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations after Desensitizing Surface Treatment with Er:YAG and CO2 Lasers. Laser Ther. 2016;25(4):259–66.

Patnana AK, Vanga VNR, Chandrabhatla SK. Evaluating the Marginal Integrity of Bulk Fill Fibre Reinforced Composites in Bio-mimetically Restored Tooth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZC24–7.

Gopinath V. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore class II cavities in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35(3):238.

Alizadeh Oskoee P, Pournaghi Azar F, Jafari Navimipour E, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Naser Alavi F, Salari A. The effect of repeated preheating of dimethacrylate and silorane-based composite resins on marginal gap of class V restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017;11(1):36–42.

Altunsoy M, Tanrıver M, Türkan U, Uslu ME, Silici S. In Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage and Microhardness of Ethanolic Extracts of Propolis in Different Proportions Added to Glass Ionomer Cement. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):136–40.

Garcia-Godoy F, Malone WF. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations after rebonding. Compendium. 1987;8(8):606–9.

Han S-H, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park S-H. Non-destructive evaluation of an internal adaptation of resin composite restoration with swept-source optical coherence tomography and micro-CT. Dent Mater. 2016 Jan;32(1):e1–7.

Published

2020-01-01

How to Cite

Morillo-Cárdenas, E. C., García Cárdenas, J. M. ., Flores-Araque, M. E., Paz-y-Miño, C. ., & Leon, P. E. (2020). Microfiltration between glass ionomer and composite resin in non-carious class-v injuries. Odontología, 22(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol22.n1.2020-66-81

Issue

Section

Scientific article