Sellado marginal en restauraciones directas con resina con uso de BRIX 3000 vs sistema rotativo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol23.n1.2021-e2633Keywords:
dental caries, dental filtration, enzymes, papain, dental restoration failureAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of the use of BRIX 3000 versus the rotary system on the marginal sealing of in vitro direct restorations. Thirty-three recently premolars were selected, with caries on the occlusal and proximal surface; where carious tissue removal was performed, for which it was worked with two groups of 15 pieces each, in group A: by means mechanical chemical technique with BRIX 3000 gel is used and in group B: by conventional technique. All dental pieces were restored by applying a glass ionomer base, adhesive system, and composite resin. The specimens were subjected to thermal cycles at temperatures of 5° to 55°C, in a total of 300 cycles; then the waterproofing of he apices was done by applying composite resin and double layer of nail varnish except for 2mm around the restoration, then they were immersed in methylene blue for 72 hours at 37°C. Subsequently, the samples were cut mesiodistal through the restoration for observation in the stereomicroscope. The results showed that there was a better marginal seal in the rotating system group with 68.33%, compared to the BRIX 3000 group with 21.67%; establishing that, there is a significant statistical difference in both techniques in the marginal seal (p = 0.000); In addition with the use of the rotary system, a better marginal sealing in occlusal was obtained with 90.00% (p = 0.000) and in the gingival margin, 46.67% did not present marginal filtration (p = 0.032); which indicates that there is significant statistical difference in the use of both techniques, at the level of the occlusal and gingival margin in the marginal sealing of direct restorations.
Downloads
References
Murdoch-Kinch C, Mclean M. Minimally invasive. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134: p. 87-95.
Naressi SCM. Comparação da infiltração marginal de restaurações adesivas empregando instrumento rotatório ou um sistema químico-mecânico na remoção do tecido cariado. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia ) Faculdade de Odontologia, Campus de São José dos Campos, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. 1999;: p. 136.
Corrêa FNP, Rocha RdO, Filho LER, Muench A, Rodrigues CRMD. Chemical Versus Conventional Caries Removal Techniques in Primary Teeth: A Microhardness Study. The Journal of Pediatric Dentistry. 2007; 31(3): p. 187 - 192.
Subramaniam P, Babu KG, Neeraja. Comparison of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chemomechanical Caries Removal (carisolv™) with that of Conventional Drilling in Reducing Cariogenic Flora. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2008; 32(3): p. 215 - 220.
Hafez MA, Elkateb M, Shabrawy SE, Mahmoud A, Meligy OE. Microleakage Evaluation of Composite Restorations Following Papain-Based Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal in Primary Teeth. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 41(1): p. 53 - 61.
Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Bachiega JC, Santis TOD, Motta LJ. Clinical and Radiographic Study of Chemical-Mechanical Removal of Caries Using Papacárie: 24-Month Follow Up. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2011; 35(3): p. 251 - 253.
Bussadori S, Guedes C, Hermida B, Ram D. Chemo-Mechanical Removal of Caries in an Adolescent Patient Using a Papain Gel: Case Report. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2008; 32(3): p. 177 - 180.
Maru VP, Shakuntala BS, Dharma N. Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Molars : Evaluation of Marginal Leakage and Shear Bond Strength in Bonded Restorations” – An in Vitro Study. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2014; 37(3): p. 269 - 273.
Pineda M, Salcedo D, Palacios E, Zambrano S, Zeballos WG, Ochoa J, et al. Influencia del uso de Papacarie en el sellado marginal de obturaciones directas. Odontologia Sanmarquina. 2008; 11(2): p. 51 - 55.
Felizardo KR, Barradas NPdA, Guedes GF, Ferreira FdCA, Lopes MB. Utilização do Gel Enzimático BRIX-3000 na Remoção Químico Mecânica da Cárie: Relato de Caso Clínico. J Health Sci. 2018; 20(2): p. 87 - 93.
Araujo NC, Oliveira APBd, Rodrigues VMdS, Andrade PMMdS. Avaliaçãodo Selamento Marginal de Restaurações Adesivas Após o Uso do Gel de Papaia. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2007; 7(1): p. 67 - 73.
Kwak J, Chiquet B, Ontiveros J, Cardenas A, Salako N, Barros J, et al. Microleakage in chemomechanical and chemotherapeutic approaches to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. Oral Rehabilitation and Dentistry. 2018; 1(1): p. 1 - 6.
Lara CL, Menacho SA, Vega GAdl. Importancia del acabado y pulido en restauraciones directas de resina compuesta en piezas dentarias anteriores. Reporte de Caso. Revista Estomatologica Herediana. 2015;: p. 145 - 151.
Pavuluri C, Nuvvula S, Kamatham RL, Nirmala S. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Conventional and RMGIC Restorations following Conventional and Chemomechanical Caries Removal:An in vitro Study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014; 7(3): p. 172 - 175.
Radhika M, Sajjan G, Kumaraswamy BN, Mittal N. Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13(1): p. 9 - 15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dennisse Dayana Vivanco Ludeña, Tannya Lucila Valarezo Bravo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.