Analysis of the marginal and internal fit of hybrid ceramic and polyetheretherketone endocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM: An In Vitro approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n1.2024-e5955

Keywords:

accuracy, computer-aided design, computer-aided milling, crown, endodontically, oral rehabilitation

Abstract

The restoration of severely damaged endodontic teeth is a challenge, since the main rehabilitation consists of posts that can generate fracture and tooth loss. As an alternative to this problem the endo crowns have been employed. This method requires less invasive preparation, but marginal and internal adaptation is important for its longevity. Objective: To analyze the marginal and internal adjustment of hybrid ceramic and polyetheretherketone endocrowns made in CAD-CAM. Methodology: In vitro experimental study in which an artificial mandibular first molar was prepared with (n=20) hybrid ceramic (n=10) and PEEK (n=10) CAD/CAM endocrowns. The marginal adjustment was evaluated using a Canon EOS-Rebel-T3i camera with a 100mm macro lens and MR-14EX-II-Macro-Ring-Lite ring-flash on four surfaces (vestibular, lingual, mesial and distal) while, the internal adjustment was evaluated at four different points (Point-A: mesio-axial-occlusal, Point-B: mesio-axial-pulpal, Point-C: disto-axial-pulpal, Point-D: disto-axial-occlusal). Statistical analysis was performed in the Stata-14 program and the results obtained were analyzed with the parametric T-Student test and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The PEEK end-crowns obtained an average marginal adjustment of 89.09±5.92μm while, the hybrid ceramic end-crowns obtained an adjustment of 98.87±4.14μm. In terms of internal adjustment, the average PEEK adjustment was 183.63±4.50μm and the average hybrid ceramic adjustment was 195.47±2.41μm. Although these variations show statistical differences, clinically there are no significant differences. Conclusions: The CAD/CAM produced endocrowns presented better marginal and internal adjustment which is observed in the PEEK material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Stephany Jasmin Arboleda Jumbo , Ministerio de Salud Publica Ecuador

Odontóloga, Ministerio de Salud Publica Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

Ivan Garcia Merino , Universidad Central del Ecuador

Docente Facultad de Odontología Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

Daniel Delgado-Piedra, Universidad Central del Ecuador

Docente Facultad de Odontología Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

References

Aldesoki Mostafa, Bourauel Christoph, Morsi Tarek, I. El-Anwar Mohamed, K. Aboelfadl Ahmad, Elshazly Tarek M. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with different endocrown designs: Finite element study. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. septiembre de 2022;133. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1751616122002223

Govare Nicolas, Contrepois Mathieu. Endocrowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. marzo de 2020;123(3):411–8. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391319302902

Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dental Materials. diciembre de 2013;29(12):e309–17. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24157244/

Al-Dabbagh RA. Survival and success of endocrowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. marzo de 2021;125(3):415.e1-415.e9. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375868399_A_Systematic_Review_and_MetaAnalysis_on_the_Fracture_Strength_Survival_and_Success_Rates_of_Endocrown_Versus_Conventional_Restorations_of_Endodontically-Treated_Teeth

Tammam Attia Raafat Abd El-Rhman. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia (5y), lithium disilicate and modified peek cad-cam endocrown materials, 3-year clinical prospective study. EGYPTIAN DENTAL JOURNAL. enero de 2021;67:635:650 Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349241846_Clinical_evaluation_of_monolithic_Zirconia_5Y_Lithium_Disilicate_and_modified_PEEK_CAD-CAM_endocrown_materials3-year_clinical_prospective_study

Santos Mariana, Coelho Ana, Baptista Anabel, Marto Carlos, Amaro Ines, Saraiva Jose, et al. Mechanical and Tribological Characterization of a Dental Ceromer. Journal of Funtional Biomaterials. el 21 de marzo de 2020;11(1):15. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339537089_Mechanical_and_Tribological_Characterization_of_a_Dental_Ceromer

Tartuk BK, Ayna E, Göncü Başaran E. Comparison of the Load-bearing Capacities of Monolithic PEEK, Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Molar Crowns. meandros. el 1 de abril de 2019;20(1):45–50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332830591_Comparison_of_the_Loadbearing_Capacities_of_Monolithic_PEEK_Zirconia_and_Hybrid_Ceramic_Molar_Crowns

Godil AZ, Kazi AI, Wadwan SA, Gandhi KY, Dugal RJS. Comparative evaluation of marginal and internal fit of endocrowns using lithium disilicate and polyetheretherketone computer-aided design - computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(2):190–4. Disponible en : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562835/

Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Polyzois G. Using modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: A short-term clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. marzo de 2017;117(3):335–9. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360180123_Marginal_integrity_and_clinical_evaluation_of_polyetheretherketone_PEEK_versus_lithium_disilicate_E-Max_endocrowns_Randomized_controlled_clinical_trial

Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations:A systematic review of in vitro studies. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. abril de 2019;121(4):590-597.e3. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30509548/

Di Fiore A, De Francesco M, Monaco C, Stocco E, Vigolo P, Stellini E. Comparison of accuracy of single-crown generated from digital and conventional impressions: an in vivo controlled trial. Journal of Osseointegration. el 14 de junio de 2019;11(2):107–12. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444482/

Dolev E, Bitterman Y, Meirowitz A. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. enero de 2019;121(1):124–8. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326063268_Comparison_of_marginal_fit_between_CAD-CAM_and_hot-press_lithium_disilicate_crowns

El Ghoul WA, Özcan M, Ounsi H, Tohme H, Salameh Z. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. enero de 2020;123(1):128–34. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31027958/

Shin Y, Park S, Park JW, Kim KM, Park YB, Roh BD. Evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different cavity depths: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. enero de 2017;117(1):109–15. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27460311/

Roy Malvika, Tewary Shivsagar, Sanyal Pronob, Kamnoor Shubha, Vande Aaditee. An in vivo study to compare the marginal fit accuracy of crowns prepared using two different materials. Evolution Med Dent Sci. el 17 de junio de 2019;8(24):1930–4. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334588721_AN_IN_VIVO_STUDY_TO_COMPARE_THE_MARGINAL_FIT_ACCURACY_OF_CROWNS_PREPARED_USING_TWO_DIFFERENT_MATERIALS

Attar Esraa, Alshali Shatha, Abuhaimed Tariq. A Comparative Study of the Marginal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study. Cureus [Internet]. 2023;15(6). Disponibleen: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246431/

Meshreky Michael, Halim Carl, Katamish Hesham. Vertical Marginal Gap Distance of CAD/CAM Milled BioHPP PEEK Coping Veneered by HIPC Compared to Zirconia Coping Veneered by CAD-On lithium disilicate “In-Vitro Study”. Advanced Dental Journal. abril de 2020;2(2):43–50. Disponible en: https://adjc.journals.ekb.eg/article_72711.html

El-Farag, S.A.A., Elerian, F.A., Elsherbiny, A.A. Impact of diferent CAD/CAM materials on internal and marginal adaptations and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations with: 3D fnite element analysis. BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2023;23(421). Disponible en: https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-023-03114-8

Published

2024-01-15

How to Cite

Arboleda Jumbo , S. J., Garcia Merino , I. ., & Delgado-Piedra, D. (2024). Analysis of the marginal and internal fit of hybrid ceramic and polyetheretherketone endocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM: An In Vitro approach. Odontología, 26(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n1.2024-e5955

Issue

Section

Scientific article

Most read articles by the same author(s)