Comparison of the efficacy of removable polyether ether ketone prostheses with traditional removable prostheses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol27.n3.esp.2025-e8389

Keywords:

removable partial denture, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polymers, cobalt chromium prosthesis, oral rehabilitation

Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a polymeric material composed of an aromatic core bonded by ketone and ether groups. The objective was to compare the efficacy of removable polyetheretherketone prostheses with that of traditional removable prostheses. A systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of the PRISMA guidelines, searching databases such as PubMed, LILACS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect. 20 articles published between 2020 and 2024 were included. The main characteristics of PEEK removable prostheses are their high biocompatibility, good mechanical properties, high-temperature resistance, chemical stability, polishability, good wear resistance, low plaque affinity, and high adhesion strength with composite resins. They have a low specific gravity, which contributes to making them lighter and more comfortable prostheses. They have a low modulus of elasticity similar to that of bone. They do not have a metallic color; however, they are available in shades of beige, pink, and white, giving them superior aesthetic properties to conventional prostheses. Their disadvantages include the retention and fatigue resistance of PEEK clasps, which were inferior to those of metal clasps. PEEK removable prostheses have wear resistance similar to that of metal alloys, although they have somewhat poor elastic strength and low hardness, increasing the risk of fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alexy Javier Lucas, Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabi

Estudiante Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Laica “Eloy Alfaro” de Manabí, Manta, Ecuador

Miguel Carrasco Sierra, Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí

Docente Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Laica “Eloy Alfaro” de Manabí, Manta, Ecuador

References

Kim JJ. Revisiting the Removable Partial Denture. Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(2):263–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.007

Silva LS, Bento VAA, Brunetto JL, Pesqueira AA. Polyetheretherketone materials for removable partial denture frameworks: an integrative review. Gen Dent. 2023;71(4):58–62. https://europepmc.org/article/med/37358585

Liu Y, Fang M, Zhao R, et al. Clinical Applications of Polyetheretherketone in Removable Dental Prostheses: Accuracy, Characteristics, and Performance. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214615

Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, et al. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(3):273–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008

Parate KP, Naranje N, Vishnani R, Paul P. Polyetheretherketone Material in Dentistry. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46485. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46485

Le Bars P, Kouadio AA, Amouriq Y, Bodic F, Blery P, Bandiaky ON. Different Polymers for the Base of Removable Dentures? Part II: A Narrative Review of the Dynamics of Microbial Plaque Formation on Dentures. Polymers (Basel). 2023;16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16010040

Wang B, Huang M, Dang P, Xie J, Zhang X, Yan X. PEEK in Fixed Dental Prostheses: Application and Adhesion Improvement. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122323

Luo Y, Qiu L, Geng M, Zhang W. Retention and fatigue performance of modified polyetheretherketone clasps for removable prosthesis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024; 154:106539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106539

Guo F, Huang S, Liu N, et al. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and fit of 3D-printed polyetheretherketone removable partial dentures. Dent Mater J. 2022;41(6):816–823. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2022-063

Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Lee W-F, Chen M-S, Peng T-Y, Huang P-C, Nikawa H, Peng P-W. Comparative analysis of the retention force and deformation of PEEK and PEKK removable partial denture clasps with different thicknesses and undercut depths. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(2):291.e1-291.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.042

Zhao K, Wu S, Qian C, Sun J. Suitability and Trueness of the Removable Partial Denture Framework Fabricating by Polyether Ether Ketone with CAD-CAM Technology. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081119

Gentz FI, Brooks DI, Liacouras PC, et al. Retentive Forces of Removable Partial Denture Clasp Assemblies Made from Polyaryletherketone and Cobalt-Chromium: A Comparative Study. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(4):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13398

Zheng J, Aarts JM, Ma S, Waddell JN, Choi JJE. Different Undercut Depths Influence on Fatigue Behavior and Retentive Force of Removable Partial Denture Clasp Materials: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(2):108–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13519

Zheng J, Aarts JM, Ma S, Waddell JN, Choi JJE. Fatigue behavior of removable partial denture cast and laser-sintered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) clasp materials. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022;8(6):1496–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.645

Souza Curinga MR, Claudino Ribeiro AK, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Pellizzer EP. Mechanical properties and accuracy of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by digital and conventional techniques: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.032

Micovic D, Mayinger F, Bauer S, Roos M, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Is the high-performance thermoplastic polyetheretherketone indicated as a clasp material for removable dental prostheses? Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(5):2859–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03603-y

Abd Allah DAEM, Nawar NH, Abdelfattah AM. Effect of two esthetic digitally produced materials used in fabrication of extracoronal attachments on the stresses Induced in removable partial dentures. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):760. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04477-2

El-Baz R, Fayad M, Abas M, Shoieb A, Gad M, Helal MA. Comparative study of some mechanical properties of cobalt chromium and polyether ether ketone thermoplastic removable partial denture clasps: an In-vitro Study. Brazilian Dent Sci. 2020;23(3). https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i3.1935

Maraka N, Alaa’a Salloum MA. Comparative study between removable partial dentures frameworks fabricated using PEEK and using Co-Cr alloy: clinical study. Teikyo Med J. 2021;44(6):2685–2692.

Barbosa L, Figueiral MH, Neves CB, et al. Fit Accuracy of Cobalt–Chromium and Polyether Ether Ketone Prosthetic Frameworks Produced Using Digital Techniques: In Vitro Pilot Study. Appl Sci. 2024;14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010118

Galvão I, Carvalho P, Feitosa R, Sousa E, MTV G, V F. Propriedades biomecânicas do poli-éter-éter-cetona (PEEK) e sua aplicação na clínica odontológica: uma revisão de literatura. J Dent Public Heal. 2020;11(1 SE-Revisões de Literatura):67–72. https://doi.org/10.17267/2596-3368dentistry.v11i1.2896

El Mekawy N, Elgamal M. Retention Assessment of High Performance Poly-etheretherketone Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Constructed by Various Techniques (in vitro Study). J Dent (Shiraz, Iran). 2021;22(4):281–289. https://doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87488.1265

Hamid NFA, Ahmad R, Ariffin F, Shuib S. Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Removable Partial Dentures: A Scoping Review. Arch Orofac Sci. Published online 2024. https://aos.usm.my/docs/Vol_19/aos-2024-0004.pdf

Le Bars P, Bandiaky ON, Le Guéhennec L, Clouet R, Kouadio AA. Different Polymers for the Base of Removable Dentures? Part I: A Narrative Review of Mechanical and Physical Properties. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173495

Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Ferrari M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01202-7

Çulhaoğlu AK, Özkır SE, Şahin V, Yılmaz B, Kılıçarslan MA. Effect of Various Treatment Modalities on Surface Characteristics and Shear Bond Strengths of Polyetheretherketone-Based Core Materials. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12702

Moby V, Dupagne L, Fouquet V, Attal J-P, François P, Dursun E. Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Interest for Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review. Mater (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;15(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196801

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Lucas, A. J., & Carrasco Sierra, M. (2025). Comparison of the efficacy of removable polyether ether ketone prostheses with traditional removable prostheses. Odontología, 27(Especial (3). https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol27.n3.esp.2025-e8389

Issue

Section

Scientific article

Most read articles by the same author(s)