Impact evaluation of the teaching and research process of the General Teaching Hospital of Calderón Quito-Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/catedra.v7i2.6084Keywords:
teaching, education, evaluation, impact, indicators, researchAbstract
The Impact Evaluation Study of the teaching and research process of the Calderón General Teaching Hospital-HGDC in the city of Quito-Ecuador in the period 2016-2022, aims to measure the impact of the Teaching and Research process with respect to: (1) academic process and resources, (2) evaluation and research, (3) learning, training and knowledge transfer and (4) clinical-surgical practice and performance; through the design and application of the impact evaluation methodology with a focus on measurable results, Balanced Scorecard-BSC. The target group was identified as undergraduate students, rotating interns, postgraduate students, teachers and health care personnel of the Higher Education Institutions (HEI) that perform their health care and academic activities at the HGDC. It was developed in three phases: the first comprises the period 2016-2020, with a total population of 949 participants and an effective sample of 291 participants, served as a baseline for the construction of the follow-up and monitoring matrix-BSC. The second phase of 2021 has 382 participants and an effective sample of 165. The third phase of 2022 has a total population of 344 and an effective sample of 128 participants. The BSC monitoring matrix resulted that the average Global Effective Impact Evaluation of the HGDC Teaching and Research process in the period 2016-2022 reached 87.39% effectiveness, reflecting that the care and teaching activities are adequately fulfilled. The research provides conclusions and suggestions aimed at improving the care and teaching processes of the hospital and allows it to be a model replicated for other institutions.
Downloads
References
Abdala, E. (2004). Manual para la evaluación de impacto en programas de formación para jóvenes. CINTERFOR-OIT.
https://www.oitcinterfor.org/sites/default/files/file_publicacion/man_eva.pdf
Aponte, C. y Pérez, A. (2021). Evaluaciones de impacto en la educación superior. SCRIBD. Colombia
Baker, J. (2000). Evaluación de impacto de los proyectos de desarrollo en la pobreza. Banco Mundial.
Barreno-Freire, S., Haro-Jácome, O., Martínez-Benítez, J., y Borja-Naranjo, G. (2022). Análisis de factores determinantes en el rendimiento académico del estudiantado de la Facultad de Filosofia de la UCE. Revista Cátedra, 5(2), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.29166/catedra.v5i2.3552
Bayona-Umbarila, J. M., Rodríguez-Hernández, C. F., y Peña Ortega, L. O. (2022). Evaluación de Impacto en Instituciones de Educación Superior. Documento de Trabajo.Tecnológico de Monterrey. https://hdl.handle.net/11285/649985.
Cambridge Assessment International Education (CAIE). (2019, April 28). Getting started with evaluating impact. [University of Cambridge website]. https://www.cambridge-community.org.uk/professional-development/gswei/index.html#group-Glossary-AyXNWgMDJA
CGFGlobal. (2016). CGF Global Aprende Libre. https://edu.gcfglobal.org/es/educacion-virtual/que-es-la-educacion-virtual/1/
Denegri, J. (2023). Evaluación del Impacto en educación superior. https://es.linkedin.com/pulse/evaluaci%C3%B3n-del-impacto-en-educaci%C3%B3n-superior-jesus-denegri?utm_source=share&utm_medium=guest_desktop&utm_campaign=copy
Kaplan, y Norton. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard. Universidad de Harvard.
Malhotra, N. K. (2004). Investigación de Mercados, Un enfoque Aplicado (4ta. ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
MSP. (2012). Estatuto Orgánico de Gestión Organizacional por Procesos de los Hospitales del Ministerio de Salud Pública. MSP.
QuestionPro. (2019). Validez y confiabilidad alfa de cronbach. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/es/que-es-la-validez-y-confiabilidad-en-la-investigacion/
Ruiz, M. L. (2019). Psicología y Mente. https://psicologiaymente.com/miscelanea/alfa-de-cronbach
UDI-HGDC. (2020-2021). Base de Datos Unidad de Docencia e Investigación-HGDC 2020-2021. MSP.UDI.
