Lesson Study as a Catalyst for Innovation in Ecuadorian English Classrooms: Teacher Experiences and Challenges

Authors

  • Sofía Marcela Egüez Carrión Universidad Nacional de Educación
  • Sandra Jazmin González González Universidad Nacional de Educación

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29166/kronos.v5i2.6939

Keywords:

Innovation, Education, Lesson Study, English Teachers

Abstract

This study explores the implementation of Lesson Study (LS) as an innovative approach within the Ecua dorian educational context, where innovation is an emerging concept. With limited prior exposure to collaborative methodologies, many Ecuadorian teachers have yet to engage in practices that promote shared learning and professional growth. The researchers aim to investigate how LS, as a collaborative model, can foster innovation among educators by enhancing teamwork, shared responsibility, and a cooperative culture. Using a qualitative methodology rooted in narra tive inquiry, two volunteer English teachers who participated in an LS workshop were interviewed in depth to capture their reflections and perceptions of LS as an innovative tool. The collected data were analyzed through content analysis, allowing themes and categories to emerge around the teachers' understanding of innovation and the role of technology in education. Key findings indicate that while technology is commonly viewed as a potential driver of innovation, the teachers also recognize that innovation can be achieved through new teaching approaches aside from technology. LS was perceived as a beneficial collaborative method that strengthens professional relationships and introduces sustainable change in teaching practices. In conclusion, the study suggests that LS has significant potential as an innovative asset for Ecuadorian educators, offering a non-technological pathway to improve teaching and learning practices and encourage a shift toward a more collaborative educational culture.

Downloads

References

Ab Rahman, Z. N., Ismail, N., & Rajiani, I.: Challenges for managing non-technological innovation: A case from Malaysian public sector. In: Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(1), pp. 7–16. Czestochowa University of Technology, Czestochowa, Poland (2018).

Alvarez, C., & Guevara, P.: PERCEPCIONES DE LOS MAESTROS DE INGLÉS SOBRE EL USO DE LOS MÓDULOS PEDAGÓGICOS EN ECUADOR: UNA ENTREVISTA DE GRUPO FOCAL. In: Revista Chakiñan de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 14, pp. 42–56. Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, Ecuador (2021) https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.14.03.

Fenwick, M., & Vermeulen, E. P. M.: Seven “Corporate Venturing” Strategies to Foster Innovation (and Create an Environment for Long-Term Growth) (2016) SSRN Homepage, https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/8, last accessed 2023/7/12

Feyen, J., Milia, M., Hoof, H. B. V., Quinde, K., Ochoa, V., Abril, V., & Bojorque, J.: Im- proving the publication visibility of Ecuador’s higher education system. In: Maskana, 7(2), Article 2. Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador (2016) https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.07.02.08

Fındıkoğlu, F., & İlhan, D.: Realization of a Desired Future: Innovation in Education. In: Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(11). Horizon Research Publishing, San Jose, US (2016). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041110

Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M.: Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. In: Technovation, pp. 90–91, 102098. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098

Gulden, M., Saltanat, K., Raigul, D., Dauren, T., & Assel, A.: Quality management of higher education: Innovation approach from perspectives of institutionalism. An exploratory liter- ature review. In: Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1749217. Taylor & Francis, Oxford, England (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1749217

Koc, M.: Student teachers’ conceptions of technology: A metaphor analysis. In: Computers & Education, 68, pp. 1–8. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.024

Kogabayev, T., & Maziliauskas, A.: The definition and classification of innovation. HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, 8(1), pp. 59–72. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1515/hjbpa-2017-0005

Leong, M., Raphael, J., & Radick, R.: Lesson Study: Participant Guide. In: Education North- west, (2021). Education Nowrthest Homepage, https://educationnorth- west.org/search?search_api_fulltext=Lesson+Study%3A+Participant+Guide, last accessed 2023/7/12.

Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T.: Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation (Vol. 47). In: SAGE Publications, Inc, California, US (1998). https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/narrative-research/book8018

Mátyás, B., Soriano, B., Carpio, I., & Carrera, P.: A brief review on startup mentoring in higher education in Ecuador. In: Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(2), pp.1–5. Al- lied Business Academies, London, England (2018).

Mon, C. C., Dali, M. H., & Sam, L. C.: Implementation of LS as an Innovative Professional Development Model among Malaysian School Teachers. In: Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1), pp. 83–111. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia (2016). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1134522

Nesusin, N., Intrarakhamhaeng, P., Supadol, P., Piengkes, N., & Poonpipathana, S.: Devel- opment of Lesson Plans by the Lesson Study Approach for the 6th Grade Students in Social Study Subject based on Open Approach Innovation. In: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 1411–1415, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.407

Pérez, Á. I., Soto, E., & Serván, M. J.: Participatory action research and the reconstruction of teachers’ practical thinking: Lesson studies and core reflection. An experience in Spain. In: Educational Action Research, 18(1), pp. 73–87. Taylor & Francis, Oxford, England (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903484533

Rajiani, I., & Ismail, N.: Management innovation in balancing technology innovation to har- ness universities performance in the era of community 4.0. In: Polish Journal of Manage- ment Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1. Czestochowa University of Technology, Czestochowa, Poland (2019) https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.24

Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., Zúñiga-Ojeda, A., & Portuguez-Castro, M.: Characterization of the Teaching Profile within the Framework of Education 4.0. In: Future Internet, 13(4), Article 4. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel, Switzerland (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13040091

Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., Cao, Q., Alam, G. M., & Li, D.: Leveraging Digital Technology for Better Learning and Education: A Systematic Literature Review. In: International Jour- nal of Information and Education Technology, 9(7), pp. 453–461. Emerald Group Publish- ing, Bingley, England (2019). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.7.1246

Serrano, M. E., Vizcaíno, C. G., Cazco, D., & Kuhlman, N. A.: Transformation: A Model for Restructuring the Preparation of English Teachers in Ecuador. In: GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 11, Article 11. ÚNICA, Bogotá, Colombia (2015). https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.289

Shuhratovich, I. U.: Application of innovation in teaching process. In: European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(5), pp. 4–8. Progressive Academic Pub- lishing, Birmingham, England (2020).

Tan-Chia, L., Fang, Y., & Chew Ang, P.: Innovating the Singapore English Language cur- riculum through LS. In: International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(3), pp. 256–280. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, England (2013) https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2013-0017

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Egüez Carrión, S. M., & González González, S. J. (2025). Lesson Study as a Catalyst for Innovation in Ecuadorian English Classrooms: Teacher Experiences and Challenges. Kronos – The Language Teaching Journal, 5(2), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.29166/kronos.v5i2.6939