Analysis of Students’ and Beneficiaries’ Perceptions and Assessments of Oral Health Promotion and Prevention Programs for Children at a School in Napo Province, Based on Surveys Conducted During Dental Education Campaigns with Supervised Toothbrushing (2023-2026)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/od.v28iEsp.10108Keywords:
Oral Health, Health Promotion, Oral Health Education, Supervised Toothbrushing, Satisfaction, Dental StudentsAbstract
The present study aimed to analyze the perceptions of students and beneficiaries regarding oral health programs for children in a school in the province of Napo during the 2023-2026 period. A descriptive study with data collection across multiple time points was designed, in which structured questionnaires were administered to participating students and beneficiaries during dental education campaigns with supervised toothbrushing. These instruments demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α = 0.86 and α = 0.82). Quantitative analysis included item-based frequencies, while qualitative analysis was conducted through the categorization of open-ended responses. The results showed a high degree of satisfaction in both populations, highlighting the positive assessment of the care received, the project’s organization, and the usefulness of the educational activities. Within the qualitative analysis, categories emerged regarding the importance of oral health education, positive experiences in practical activities, and the necessity of optimizing logistical aspects. It is concluded that oral health promotion and prevention programs generate a positive impact on both the beneficiary population and the academic training of the students.
Downloads
References
1. Al Ghanem EJ, AlGhanem NA, AlFaraj ZS, AlShayib LY, AlGhanem DA, AlQudaihi WS, et al. Patient satisfaction with dental services. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49223. doi:10.7759/cureus.49223.
2. Al-Abri R, Al-Balushi A. Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Med J. 2014;29(1):3-7. doi:10.5001/omj.2014.02.
3. Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Savino MM, Amenta P. Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Perspect Public Health. 2017;137(2):89-101. doi:10.1177/1757913916634136.
4. Bramantoro T, Santoso CMA, Hariyani N, Setyowati D, Zulfiana AA, Nor NAM, et al. Effectiveness of the school-based oral health promotion programmes from preschool to high school: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256007. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256007.
5. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, Bartold PM, Dommisch H, Eickholz P, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S74-S84. doi:10.1002/JPER.17-0719.
6. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2023.
7. Damle SG, Patil A, Jain S, Damle D, Chopal N. Effectiveness of supervised toothbrushing and oral health education in improving oral hygiene status and practices of urban and rural school children: a comparative study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014;4(3):175-181. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.142021.
8. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923-1958. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
9. Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal DK. Likert scale: explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology. 2015;7(4):396-403. doi:10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975.
10. Jürgensen N, Petersen PE. Promoting oral health of children through schools - results from a WHO global survey 2012. Community Dent Health. 2013;30(4):204-218.
11. Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabé E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors. J Dent Res. 2017;96(4):380-387. doi:10.1177/0022034517693566.
12. Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Plan Nacional de Salud Bucal. Quito: Ministerio de Salud Pública; 2009.
13. Mireles Vázquez MG, García García JA. Satisfacción estudiantil en universitarios: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista Educación. 2022;46(2):610-626. doi:10.15517/revedu.v46i2.47621.
14. Nakre PD, Harikiran AG. Effectiveness of oral health education programs: a systematic review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2013;3(2):103-115. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.127810.
15. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Política sobre etnicidad y salud. Documento CSP29/7, Rev. 1. Washington, DC: OPS; 2017.
16. Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249-260. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8.
17. Strauss RP, Stein MB, Edwards J, Nies KC. The impact of community-based dental education on students. J Dent Educ. 2010;74(10 Suppl):S42-S55. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.10_suppl.tb04980.x.
18. World Health Organization. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
19. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. JAMA. 2025;333(1):71-74. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.21972.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria de los Angeles Romero Guerrón, Germania Catalina Cabrera Rosero, Jenny Edith Collantes Acuña, Juan Pablo Rodríguez Villarreal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
