Quality of life and dental prostheses over the years: a systematic review

Authors

  • Paulo Roberto Silva Alumno de Posdoctorado. Departamento de Odontología Social de la Universidad de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo
  • Márcia Cristina Lopes PhD en formación. Departamento de Odontología Social de la Universidad de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo
  • Edisson F López Profesor Titular del Departamento de Odontopediatria de la Universidad Central del Ecuador
  • Maria Gabriela Haye Biazevic Profesora Doctora del Departamento de Odontología Social de la Universidad de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo
  • Edgard Michel-Crosato Profesor Doctor Libre Docente de la Universidad de São Paulo (USP)

Keywords:

Quality of life, prosthetic rehabilitation, systematic review

Abstract

Objective: To perform a systematic review of the studies with prosthetic interventions that accompanied the quality of life of the patients after treatments and to discover how the quality of life of these people changes over the years. Review: Articles were selected from October 10, 2015 to April 6, 2016, through five databases by two independent examiners (Kappa> 0.8). MEDLINE (1997-2014), SCOPUS, Sciencedirect, Cochrane Library and LILACS, in English, Portuguese and Spanish. The keywords used were: “Quality of life” and / or “dental prosthesis” and / or “oral health” and / or “longitudinal studies” and / or “prosthetic rehabilitation”. Selection criteria: Work with prosthetic intervention, quality of life and longitudinal follow-up of this intervention. Exclusion criteria were: lack of methodological quality (High Bias), articles not consistent with the objective of this research, privation of longitudinal data and studies that did not use specific measures to quantify the quality of life. Data collection and analysis: The determination of the 15 final articles selected was performed by the two independent examiners and one reviewer together. Results: Because the quality of life measures are scales, it is difficult to compare all the studies as if it were a single one. However, because of the proposed objective of the study, we could perceive that prosthetic treatment improves appearance, oral function, health and social well-being of the people, being maintained over the years while the prostheses perform their functions. Conclusions: The study leads us to scientific evidence that the quality of life of people, in the case of placement of prostheses, is influenced by this dental treatment over the years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community dental health. Mar 1988;5(1):3-18.

Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile. Community dental health. 1994 Mar;11(1):3-11.

Reisine ST, Fertig J, Weber J, Leder S. Impact of dental conditions on patients’ quality of life. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1989 Sep;17(1):7-10.

Strauss RP, Hunt RJ. Understanding the value of teeth to older adults: influences on the quality of life. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1939 Jan;124(1):105-10.

Michel-Crosato E, Biazevic MGH, Crosato E. Relationship between dental fluorosis and quality of life: a population based study. Brazilian oral research. 2005 Apr-Jun;19(2):150-5.

Rosenberg D, Kaplan S, Senie R, Badner V. Relationships among dental functional status, clinical dental measures, and generic health measures. Journal of dental education. 1988 Nov;52(11):653-7.

Nuttall N, Steele J, Pine C, White D, Pitts N. Adult dental health survey: The impact of oral health on people in the UK in 1998. Br Dent J. 2001 Feb 10;190(3):121-6.

Programa de estatística - Bioestat - versão 5.3 – disponível em http://www.mamiraua.org.br/pt-br/downloads/programas/bioestat-versao-53/

Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D.A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):141-7.

Allen PF, McMillan AS.A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Apr;14(2):173-9.

John MT, Slade GD, Szentpetery A, Setz JM. Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):503-11.

Wolfart S, Heydecke G, Luthardt RG, Marré B, Freesmeyer WB, Stark H, Wöstmann B, Mundt T, Pospiech P, Jahn F, Gitt I, Schädler M, Aggstaller H, Talebpur F, Busche E, Bell M. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Nov;32(11):815-22.

Berretin-Felix G, Nary Filho H, Padovani CR, Machado WM. A longitudinal study of quality of life of elderly with mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jul;19(7):704-8.

Alfadda SA, Attard NJ, David LA. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul- Aug;22(4):368-73.

Petricevic N, Celebic A, Rener-Sitar K. A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e956-63.

Jabbour Z, Emami E, de Grandmont P, Rompré PH, Feine JS. Is oral health-related quality of life stable following rehabilitation with mandibular two-implant overdentures? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1205-9.

Stober T, Danner D, Lehmann F, Séché AC, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ. Association between patient satisfaction with complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life: two-year longitudinal assessment. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):313-8.

Wolfart S, Moll D, Hilgers RD, Wolfart M, Kern M. Implant placement under existing removable dental prostheses and its effect on oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Dec;24(12):1354-9.

Bramanti E, Matacena G, Cecchetti F, Arcuri C, Cicciù M. Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients before and after implant therapy: a 2-year longitudinal study. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013 Oct 15;6(2):37-42.

Wolfart S, Müller F, Gerß J, Heyedcke G, Marré B, Böning K, Wöstmann B, Kern M, Mundt T, Hannak W, Brückner J, Passia N, Jahn F, Hartmann S, Stark

H, Richter EJ, Gernet W, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. The randomized shortened dental arch study: oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Investig.

;18(2):525-33.

Jenei Á, Sándor J, Hegedűs C, Bágyi K, Nagy L, Kiss C, Szabó G, Márton IJ. Oral health-related quality of life after prosthetic rehabilitation: a longitudinal study with the OHIP questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 10; 13:99.

Fueki K, Igarashi Y, Maeda Y, Baba K, Koyano K, Sasaki K, Akagawa Y, Kuboki T, Kasugai S, Garrett NR. Effect of prosthetic restoration on oral health-related quality of life in patients with shortened dental arches: a multicentre study. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Sep;42(9):701-8.

Al-Imam H, Özhayat EB, Benetti AR, Pedersen AM, Gotfredsen K. Oral health-related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis. J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Jan;43(1):23-30.

Published

2018-11-13

How to Cite

Silva, P. R., Lopes, M. C., López, E. F., Haye Biazevic, M. G., & Michel-Crosato, E. (2018). Quality of life and dental prostheses over the years: a systematic review. Odontología, 18(2), 91–99. Retrieved from https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/1351

Issue

Section

Systematic Reviews

Most read articles by the same author(s)