Rehabilitation of the upper maxilar with a superior hybrid in Peek clinical: case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol23.n2.2021-e1578Keywords:
Dental implants, dental protesis, denture parcial fixedAbstract
We present a case of high complexity of assisted implant prosthesis replacing the metal by a semicrystalline linear polycyclic thermoplastic material such as polyetheretherketone PEEK that has been proposed for the manufacture of hybrids or protocols in implantology. This article summarizes the current research on the applications of PEEK in dental implants, especially for the improvement of the surface and body modifications of PEEK. This article is about a clinical case of a male patient who was treated as a superior protocol with PEEK structure and free metal crowns.
Downloads
References
Schwitalla A. Muller W. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013 Dec;39(6):743-9. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Shariq N. Muhammad S. Zafar. Zohaib K. Fahad S. Applications of polytheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J. Elsevier 2015.
Fitria R. Yuichi I. Kosuke K. Takashi M. Megumi W. Tetsuo I. PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 35; doi:10.3390/dj50400.
Davood A.Nida I. Maliheh S. Izman S. Kadir M. Tunku K. Preparation Methods for Improving PEEK’s Bioactivity for Orthopedic and Dental Application: A Review. International Journal of Biomaterials Volume 2016.
Brånemark, P.I.; Adell, R.; Breine, U.; Hansson, B.O.; Lindstrom, J.; Ohlsson, A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1969, 3, 81–100.
Schalock, P. Menné, T. Johansen, J. Taylor, J. Maibach, H. Lidén, C. Bruze, M. Thyssen, J. Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants-Diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Dermat. 2012, 66, 4–19.
Nakamura, K. Kanno, T. Milleding, P. Ortengren, U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: A systematic review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2010, 23, 299–309.
Wang, H. Xu, M. Zhang, W. Kwok, D.Jiang, J. Wu, Z. Chu, P. Mechanical and biological characteristics of diamond-like carbon coated poly aryl-ether-ether-ketone. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 8181–8187.
Becker, W. Doerr, J. Becker, B. A novel method for creating an optimal emergence profile adjacent to dental implants. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2012, 24, 395–400.
Koutouziz, T. Richardson, J. Lundgren, T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J. Oral Implantol. 2011, 37, 174–182.
Jörn D, Kohorst P, Besdo S, Rücker M, Stiesch M, Borchers L. Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(2):340-8.
Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S. Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomed 2012; 7:1215–25.
Wang L. He S. Wu X. Liang S. Mu Z. Wei J. Polyetheretherketone/nano-fluorohydroxyapatite composite with antimicrobial activity and osseointegration properties. Biomaterials 2014; 35:6758–75.
Hahnel S. Wieser A. Lang R. Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014.
Koutouzis T. Richardson J. Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J Oral Implantol 2011; 37:174–82.
Alt V. Hannig M. Wo stmann B. Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dental Mater 2011; 27:339–47.
Reich S. Wichmann M. Nkenke E. Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174–9.
Stawarczyk B. Ender A. Trottmann A. O¨ zcan M, Fischer J. Hammerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16:1669–77.
Katsoulis J. et al. In vitro precisión of fit computer – aided design and computer – aided manufacturing titanium and zirconiium dioxide bars. Dent Mater. 2013 Sep; 29(9):945-53. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Egilmez F. Ergun G. Cekic‑Nagas I. Bozkaya S. Implant‑supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline case. European Journal of Dentistry, Vol 9 / Issue 3 / Jul-Sep 2015.
Datte et al. Influence of different restorative materials on the stress distribution in dental implants. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018; 10(5):e439-44.
Hahnel S. Wieser A. Lang R. Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Impl. Research. 00. 2014, 1s.
Schwitalla A. Abou-Emara M. Spintig T. Lackmann J. Müller W. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Gonzalez J. The evolution of dental materials for hybrid prosthesis. Open Dent J. 2014 May 16; 8:85-94.
Geckili O. Bilhan H. Ceylan G. Cilingir A. Edentulous maxillary arch fixed implant rehabilitation using a hybrid prosthesis made of micro-ceramic-composite: case report. J Oral Implantol. 2013 Feb;39(1):115-20.
Blanch-Martínez, N. Arias-Herrera, S. and Martínez-González A.Behavior of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) in prostheses on dental implants. A review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May; 13(5): e520–e526.
Ioannis Papathanasiou, Phophi Kamposiora, George Papavasiliou and Marco Ferrari. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. Papathanasiou et al. BMC Oral Health (2020) 20:217 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01202-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Samanta María Burneo Carrera, Rosa Ana Chiluisa Muso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
