Rehabilitación del maxilar superior con una prótesis híbrida superior en Peek: reporte de caso clínico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol23.n2.2021-e1578Palabras clave:
Implantes dentales, prótesis dental, prótesis parcial fijaResumen
Se presenta un caso de alta complejidad de prótesis implanto asistida, reemplazando el metal por un material termoplástico policíclico lineal semicristalino como el polieteretercetona PEEK que se ha propuesto para la fabricación de hibridas o protocolos en implantología. Este artículo resume las investigaciones actuales sobre las aplicaciones de PEEK en implantes dentales, especialmente para la mejora de las modificaciones de la superficie y del cuerpo de PEEK. A propósito de un caso clínico en un paciente de sexo masculino en el que se realizó como tratamiento un protocolo superior con estructura PEEK y coronas libres de metal.
Descargas
Citas
Schwitalla A. Muller W. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013 Dec;39(6):743-9. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Shariq N. Muhammad S. Zafar. Zohaib K. Fahad S. Applications of polytheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J. Elsevier 2015.
Fitria R. Yuichi I. Kosuke K. Takashi M. Megumi W. Tetsuo I. PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 35; doi:10.3390/dj50400.
Davood A.Nida I. Maliheh S. Izman S. Kadir M. Tunku K. Preparation Methods for Improving PEEK’s Bioactivity for Orthopedic and Dental Application: A Review. International Journal of Biomaterials Volume 2016.
Brånemark, P.I.; Adell, R.; Breine, U.; Hansson, B.O.; Lindstrom, J.; Ohlsson, A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1969, 3, 81–100.
Schalock, P. Menné, T. Johansen, J. Taylor, J. Maibach, H. Lidén, C. Bruze, M. Thyssen, J. Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants-Diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Dermat. 2012, 66, 4–19.
Nakamura, K. Kanno, T. Milleding, P. Ortengren, U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: A systematic review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2010, 23, 299–309.
Wang, H. Xu, M. Zhang, W. Kwok, D.Jiang, J. Wu, Z. Chu, P. Mechanical and biological characteristics of diamond-like carbon coated poly aryl-ether-ether-ketone. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 8181–8187.
Becker, W. Doerr, J. Becker, B. A novel method for creating an optimal emergence profile adjacent to dental implants. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2012, 24, 395–400.
Koutouziz, T. Richardson, J. Lundgren, T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J. Oral Implantol. 2011, 37, 174–182.
Jörn D, Kohorst P, Besdo S, Rücker M, Stiesch M, Borchers L. Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(2):340-8.
Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S. Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomed 2012; 7:1215–25.
Wang L. He S. Wu X. Liang S. Mu Z. Wei J. Polyetheretherketone/nano-fluorohydroxyapatite composite with antimicrobial activity and osseointegration properties. Biomaterials 2014; 35:6758–75.
Hahnel S. Wieser A. Lang R. Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014.
Koutouzis T. Richardson J. Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J Oral Implantol 2011; 37:174–82.
Alt V. Hannig M. Wo stmann B. Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dental Mater 2011; 27:339–47.
Reich S. Wichmann M. Nkenke E. Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174–9.
Stawarczyk B. Ender A. Trottmann A. O¨ zcan M, Fischer J. Hammerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16:1669–77.
Katsoulis J. et al. In vitro precisión of fit computer – aided design and computer – aided manufacturing titanium and zirconiium dioxide bars. Dent Mater. 2013 Sep; 29(9):945-53. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Egilmez F. Ergun G. Cekic‑Nagas I. Bozkaya S. Implant‑supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline case. European Journal of Dentistry, Vol 9 / Issue 3 / Jul-Sep 2015.
Datte et al. Influence of different restorative materials on the stress distribution in dental implants. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018; 10(5):e439-44.
Hahnel S. Wieser A. Lang R. Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Impl. Research. 00. 2014, 1s.
Schwitalla A. Abou-Emara M. Spintig T. Lackmann J. Müller W. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Gonzalez J. The evolution of dental materials for hybrid prosthesis. Open Dent J. 2014 May 16; 8:85-94.
Geckili O. Bilhan H. Ceylan G. Cilingir A. Edentulous maxillary arch fixed implant rehabilitation using a hybrid prosthesis made of micro-ceramic-composite: case report. J Oral Implantol. 2013 Feb;39(1):115-20.
Blanch-Martínez, N. Arias-Herrera, S. and Martínez-González A.Behavior of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) in prostheses on dental implants. A review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May; 13(5): e520–e526.
Ioannis Papathanasiou, Phophi Kamposiora, George Papavasiliou and Marco Ferrari. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. Papathanasiou et al. BMC Oral Health (2020) 20:217 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01202-7.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Samanta María Burneo Carrera, Rosa Ana Chiluisa Muso
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
