Comparison of three camera systems in intraoral photographs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n2.2023-e4527

Keywords:

camera systems, intraoral photograph, dental photography

Abstract

Objective: Identify the camera system that has the best features for intraoral photography, evaluating five aspects: sharpness, depth of field, exposure, white balance and image composition on each photograph and observe which system obtains better results. Methodology: The following study is observational analytical cross-sectional; in which 45 intraoral photographs were evaluated, which were the product of three different camera systems: 15 from a Canon Camera (Reflex), 15 from a Sony Camera (Compact) and 15 from an IPhone 7 Camera (Mobile Device). The evaluation was carried out based on the 5 aspects mentioned in the objective by three teachers from the FDCUE, who did not know with which camera system the photographs they were evaluating were taken. The results obtained were statistically analyzed in the SPSS program, and the Fisher's exact test was applied to assess the difference between the groups. Results: Reflex 68.89%, Compact: 37.78%, iPhone 7: 35.56%. Depth of field: Reflex: 84.44%, Compact: 44.44%, iPhone 7: 51.11%. Exposure: Reflex: 88.89%, Compact: 51.11%, iPhone 7: 28.89%. White balance: Reflex: 86.67%, Compact: 53.33%, iPhone 7: 22.22%. Composition: Reflex: 73.33%, Compact: 46.67%, iPhone 7: 33.33%. Conclusions: It was determined through the statistical results among the three camera systems that the reflex camera was the one that had the best results in all the proposed fields, with a significant difference, especially compared to the camera of the mobile device (iPhone 7).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carlina América Abad Caballero, Investigador Independiente

Investigador Independiente; Quito, Ecuador

Jorge Augusto Naranjo Izurieta, Universidad Central del Ecuador

Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Central del Ecuador; Quito, Ecuador

José Antonio Reyes Cañizares, Universidad Central del Ecuador

Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Central del Ecuador; Quito, Ecuador

References

Paredes V, Martí M, Estrela F. Protocolo para la toma de fotografías digitales en ortodoncia. ODONTOL PEDIÁTR (Madrid). 1971;1113:5181.

Ahmad I. Digital dental photography. Part 1: An overview. Br Dent J. 2009;206(8):403–7.

Casaglia A, Dominicis PDE, Arcuri L, Gargari M, Ottria L. review d enTal phoTography Today . p arT 1 : basic concepTs. 2015;(2):122–9.

Ahmad I. Digital dental photography. Part 4: Choosing a camera. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2009;206(11):575–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.476

Juzer S. Miyajiwala MGK, Patankar1 AH, Tabrez A. Lakha. Comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection: A clinical evaluation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017;17(3).

Schropp L. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(3):235–41.

Kohara EK, Abdala CG, Novaes TF, Braga MM, Haddad AE, Mendes FM. Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions? PLoS One. 2018;13(9):1–12.

Samawi S. here’s Something About MDP (Mobile Dental Photography)!.. [Internet]. The Orthodontic Notefile. 2017. Available from: https://theorthodonticnotefile.blog/2017/08/10/theres-something-about-mdp-mobile-dental-photography/

Grigollo Patussi E, Garcia Poltronieri BC, Ottoni R, Bervian J, Lisboa C, Corazza PH. Comparisons between photographic equipment for dental use: DSLR cameras vs. smartphones. Rev da Fac Odontol - UPF. 2019;24(2):198–203.

Shrestha P, Poudel S. Comparison between Mobile Camera and DSLR Camera Photography for the Evaluation of Shade of Anterior Teeth - A Cross-Sectional Study. J Chitwan Med Coll. 2019;9(2):111–9.

Sampaio CS, Atria PJ, Hirata R, Jorquera G. Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2019;121(2):333–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.009

Parrish L, Sagun R, Hess SJ, Gaspard G, Chong C, Gruwell S. A Comparison of Three Camera Systems for Intraoral Photography. N Y State Dent J [Internet]. 2016;82(4):32–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30561960

Prasad A, Sivakumar A. Smartphone vs dslr dental photography among orthodontists. Indian J Public Heal Res Dev [Internet]. 2020;11(6):113–7. Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijphrd&type=home%0Ahttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emexb&NEWS=N&AN=2004762168

Published

2023-08-19

How to Cite

Abad Caballero, C. A., Naranjo Izurieta, J. A., & Reyes Cañizares, J. A. (2023). Comparison of three camera systems in intraoral photographs. Odontología, 25(2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n2.2023-e4527

Issue

Section

Scientific article