Apical microfiltration in ducted tubes with and without dentinary pretreatment: In vitro Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29166/odontologia.vol20.n1.2018-50-60Keywords:
Dentine clay, citric acid, EDTA, sealing materialsAbstract
The apical microfiltration is one of the causes of the failure in the endodontic treatments, which is due to the poor adaptation of the materials, to the solubility of the cement sealer, or to the contraction of the root filling. Objective: To determine apical microfiltration in sealed ducts without and with EDTA and citric acid pretreatment. Materials and methods: 30 recently extracted uniradicular premolar teeth were instrumented and randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 pieces each, being: G1= teeth without dentin pretreatment (control group), G2= teeth with 17% EDTA dentin pretreatment, G3= teeth with 10% citric acid pretreatment. All the groups were then irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl, followed by physiological saline and finally sealed with TopSeal resinous cement (Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany). After diaphanization of the teeth, observation was made in an optical stereomicroscope and the linear microfiltration was measured with a digital calibrator. The data were processed and analyzed through the ANOVA test and the Tukey test with a level of significance of 5%. Results: The means were 1.61, 0.54, 0.12 for G1, G2 and G3 respectively. There was a significant difference between the groups that received pretreatment dentin with the control group (p <0.001). No significant differences were found between the groups that received dentin pretreatment (p<0.364). Conclusion: The two types of dentin pretreatment efficiently decreased apical microfiltration without a statistically significant difference between the two.
Downloads
References
Canalda C, Brau E. Endodoncia: Técnicas clínicas y bases científicas. 3ra ed. Barcelona: Elsevier España; 2014
Pashley DH, Michelich V, Kehi T. Dentin permeability: effects of smear layer removed. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 46(5): 531-7
Pashley EL, Tao L, Derkson G, Pashley D. Dentin permeability and bond strengths af¬ter various surface treatmentes. Dent Mater. 1989; 5(6): 375-8
Drake DR. Wieman A, Rivera E, Walton R. Bacteria retention in canal walls in vitro: effects of smear layer. J Endod. 1994; 20(2): 78-82
Martinelly S, Strehl A, Mesa M. Estudio de la eficacia de diferentes soluciones de EDTA y ácido cítrico en la remoción del barro den¬tinario. Odontoestomatología. 2012; 14(19): 52-63
Soares I, Goldberg F. Endodoncia: técnicas y fundamentos. 2da ed. Buenos Aires - Argenti¬na: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2012
Violich D, Chandler N. The smear layer in endodontics – a review. Int Endod J. 2010; 43(2): 2-15
Schmitt P, Di Spagna S. Evaluación del sella¬miento marginal apical de obturaciones con gutapercha, con y sin la remoción de la cama¬da superficial de barro dentinario estudio in vitro. Electronic J Endod Rosario. 2003; 4(2): 1- 8
Ravikumar J, Bhavana V, Chandrashekar T, Satyanarayana G, Ganesh Kumar S, Rahul B. The effect of four different irrigating solu¬tions on the shear bond strength of endodon¬tic sealer to dentin – An In-vitro study. J Int Oral He. 2014; 6(1): 85-88
Kumar Y, Lohar J, Bhat S, Bhati1 M, Gandhi A, Mehta A. Comparative evaluation of de¬mineralization of radicular dentin with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 10% citric acid, and MTAD at different time intervals: An in vitro study. Journal of International So¬ciety of Preventive and Community Dentis¬try. 2016; 6(1); 44-48
Reis C, De-Deus G, Leal F, Azevedo E, Cou¬thino T, Paciornik S. Strong effect on dentin after root the use of high concentrations of citric acid: na assessment with co-site optical microscopy and ESEM. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(12): 1608 - 15
Bohórquez AE, Terán SB. Comparación del sellado apical entre dos sistemas de obtura¬ción (calamus), (guttacore): Estudio in Vitro. Revista Facultad de “ODONTOLOGÍA”. 2016; 18(1): 41-46
Chengue N, Cervantes F, Moreno E, Espino¬sa I, Bautista M. Técnica de diafanización en dientes humanos extraídos como material di¬dáctico para el conocimiento del sistema de conductos radiculares. Journal of Medicina Oral. 2007; 9(3). p. 78-80
De La Rosa KS, Farfán AM. Prevalencia de un tercer conducto en primeros premolares superiores mediante diafanización. Revis¬ta Facultad de “ODONTOLOGÍA”, 2016; 18(1): 26-32
Guerrero B, Ramírez S, Varela O, Mondragón E, Meléndez R, León C, et al. Evaluación del sellado apical de sistemas resinosos en la ob¬turación de conductos radiculares “Estudio in vitro”. Acta odontológica Venezolana. 2010; 48(1): 1-11
Gibby S, Wong Y, Kulild J, Wiliams K, Yao X, Walker M. Novel methodology to evaluate the effect of residual moisture on epoxy resin sealer/dentine interface: a pilot study. Int En¬ dod J. 2011; 44(3): 236-44
Garcia A, Torres J. Obturación en endodon¬cia- Nuevos sistemas de obturació: revisión de literatura. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2011;21(3):166-174.
Tuncer K, Gokyay S, Yuzbasioglu E, Kara B, Yavuz T, Orucoglu H. Effect of smear layer removal after post space preparation on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2013; 19(2): 124-28
Tuncer A, Tuncer S. Effect of Different Fi¬nal Irrigation Solutions on Dentinal Tubule Penetration Depth and Percentage of Root Canal Sealer. JOE. 2012; 38(6): 860-3
Sayin TC, Serper A, Cehreli ZC, Otlu HG. The effect of EDTA, EGTA, EDTAC, and te¬tracycline-HCl with and without subsequent NaOCl treatment on the microhardness of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(3): 418-24
